Theodoroff Sarah M, Folmer Robert L
Gen Dent. 2015 May-Jun;63(3):71-6.
The purpose of this study was to record and compare audiometric pure tone thresholds of dental clinicians (DCs), dental professionals (DPs), and dental students (DSs); determine the percentage of these groups who use hearing protection devices while at work in the clinic; and measure the sound intensities generated by a few representative high-speed handpieces while they are being used on patients. Participants included DCs who regularly used these handpieces (n = 16), DPs who did not use these handpieces (n = 13), and DSs (n = 8). A questionnaire was used to collect demographic information, assess occupational and recreational noise exposure, and note the level of hearing protection used. A sound level meter was used to measure the sound intensity generated by dental instruments near a clinician's ear. Results showed that DCs who regularly used high-speed handpieces had worse hearing than did members of the other study groups. These results indicate that the implementation of protective strategies should help to reduce the prevalence of occupational hearing loss among DCs.
本研究的目的是记录并比较牙科临床医生(DCs)、牙科专业人员(DPs)和牙科学生(DSs)的听力纯音阈值;确定这些群体中在诊所工作时使用听力保护装置的比例;并测量一些有代表性的高速手机在用于患者治疗时产生的声音强度。参与者包括经常使用这些手机的DCs(n = 16)、不使用这些手机的DPs(n = 13)以及DSs(n = 8)。通过问卷调查收集人口统计学信息,评估职业和娱乐性噪声暴露情况,并记录所使用的听力保护水平。使用声级计测量牙科器械在临床医生耳边产生的声音强度。结果显示,经常使用高速手机的DCs听力比其他研究组的成员更差。这些结果表明,实施保护策略应有助于降低DCs中职业性听力损失的患病率。