Bahannan S, el-Hamid A A, Bahnassy A
Department of Prosthodontics, King Abdul Aziz University, Faculty of Dentistry, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
J Prosthet Dent. 1993 Oct;70(4):356-60. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(93)90222-a.
Impaired hearing in dental practitioners has been the subject of various investigations. Although individual age and susceptibility can play a significant role, the intensity of the noise, distance from the noise source, and total duration of the noise are the important factors in hearing. In this study the noise levels of different handpieces and laboratory engines were evaluated. Handpiece noise measurements were made while instruments were running free and during operation with various cutting tools. These measurements were performed with two kinds of noise-measuring equipment: (1) a precision sound level meter and (2) a noise recording and analyzing circuit. The results indicated that (1) there were significant differences among the noise levels of the various dental engines used, (2) the low-speed, angled-design handpiece has the lowest noise level, whereas the laboratory engine has the highest, (3) the noise level increases during cutting was compared with noncutting, and (4) there was no significant difference between the two methods of measurement.
牙科从业者听力受损一直是各种调查的主题。尽管个体年龄和易感性可能起重要作用,但噪声强度、与噪声源的距离以及噪声的总持续时间是影响听力的重要因素。在本研究中,对不同手机和实验室发动机的噪声水平进行了评估。在器械空转以及使用各种切割工具操作期间进行了手机噪声测量。这些测量使用了两种噪声测量设备:(1)精密声级计和(2)噪声记录与分析电路。结果表明:(1)所使用的各种牙科发动机的噪声水平存在显著差异;(2)低速、角形设计的手机噪声水平最低,而实验室发动机的噪声水平最高;(3)与非切割状态相比,切割过程中噪声水平会升高;以及(4)两种测量方法之间没有显著差异。