González-Block Miguel Ángel, Alarcón Irigoyen José, Figueroa Lara Alejandro, Ibarra Espinosa Ignacio, Cortés Llamas Noemí
Diseño de Políticas y Programas de Salud, PricewaterhouseCoopers México; Universidad Anáhuac; Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Mexico.
Sector Salud, PricewaterhouseCoopers, México.
Gac Med Mex. 2015 Mar-Apr;151(2):278-80.
proposed to establish a service packages, whether through a single obligatory list or through the definition of a flexible, high priority set to be offered to specific populations according to their economic possibilities. For the strategic purchasing of services, two alternatives are proposed: to assign the fund either to a single national manager or to each of the existing public provider institutions, with the expectation that they would contract across each other and with private providers to fulfill their complementary needs.The proposal does not consider the risks and alternatives to a single tax contribution fund, which could have been suggested given that it is not an essential part of a National Universal Health System. However, it is necessary to discuss in more detail the roles and strategies for a national single-payer, especially for the strategic purchasing of high-cost and specialized interventions in the context of public and private providers. The alternative of allocating funds directly to providers would undermine the incentives for competition and collaboration and the capacity to steer providers towards the provision of high quality health services.It is proposed to focus the discussion of the reform of the national health system around strategic purchasing and the functions and structure of a single-payer as well as of agencies to articulate integrated health service networks as tools to promote quality and efficiency of the National Universal Health System. The inclusion of economic incentives to providers will be vital for competition, but also for the cooperation of providers within integrated, multi-institutional health service networks.Health professionals and sector policy specialists coordinated by the Centro de Estudios Espinosa Yglesi as in Mexico propose a policy to anchor the health system in primary care centered on the individual. The vision includes effective stewardship,solid financing, and the provision of services by a plurality of providers - including eventually those in the private sector. A unified approach to financing health through a unique, exclusively tax-based fund would be established. Alternatives are
提议建立服务包,无论是通过单一的强制性清单,还是通过定义一套灵活的、高优先级的服务包,以便根据特定人群的经济能力提供给他们。对于服务的战略采购,提出了两种选择:将资金分配给单一的国家管理者,或者分配给每个现有的公共服务提供机构,期望它们能够相互签约并与私人服务提供者签约,以满足各自的互补需求。该提议没有考虑单一税收贡献基金的风险和替代方案,鉴于其并非国家全民健康系统的核心部分,本可提出这些方案。然而,有必要更详细地讨论国家单一支付者的角色和战略,特别是在公共和私人服务提供者背景下,对高成本和专业化干预措施进行战略采购的情况。将资金直接分配给服务提供者的做法会削弱竞争和合作的激励机制,以及引导服务提供者提供高质量医疗服务的能力。提议将国家卫生系统改革的讨论重点放在战略采购、单一支付者的职能和结构,以及作为促进国家全民健康系统质量和效率工具的整合医疗卫生服务网络机构上。对服务提供者纳入经济激励措施对于竞争至关重要,对于整合的多机构医疗卫生服务网络内的服务提供者合作也至关重要。由墨西哥的埃斯皮诺萨·伊格莱西亚斯研究中心协调的卫生专业人员和部门政策专家提议制定一项政策,将卫生系统锚定在以个人为中心的初级保健上。这一愿景包括有效的管理、稳健的融资,以及由多个服务提供者提供服务——最终包括私营部门的服务提供者。将建立一种通过单一的、完全基于税收的基金为卫生事业融资的统一方法。还有其他选择……