Kim Jung-Hee, Shin Sujin, Park Jin-Hwa
Department of Nursing, College of Health Sciences, Dankook University, Cheonan, Korea.
Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea.
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015 Apr;45(2):159-68. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.2.159.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of nursing studies using structural equation modeling in Korea.
Databases of KISS, DBPIA, and National Assembly Library up to March 2014 were searched using the MeSH terms 'nursing', 'structure', 'model'. A total of 152 studies were screened. After removal of duplicates and non-relevant titles, 61 papers were read in full.
Of the sixty-one articles retrieved, 14 studies were published between 1992 and 2000, 27, between 2001 and 2010, and 20, between 2011 and March 2014. The methodological quality of the review examined varied considerably.
The findings of this study suggest that more rigorous research is necessary to address theoretical identification, two indicator rule, distribution of sample, treatment of missing values, mediator effect, discriminant validity, convergent validity, post hoc model modification, equivalent models issues, and alternative models issues should be undergone. Further research with robust consistent methodological study designs from model identification to model respecification is needed to improve the validity of the research.
本研究旨在评估韩国使用结构方程模型的护理研究的方法学质量。
使用医学主题词“护理”“结构”“模型”检索截至2014年3月的KISS、DBPIA和国民议会图书馆数据库。共筛选出152项研究。在去除重复项和不相关标题后,对61篇论文进行了全文阅读。
在检索到的61篇文章中,14项研究发表于1992年至2000年之间,27项发表于2001年至2010年之间,20项发表于2011年至2014年3月之间。所审查的研究的方法学质量差异很大。
本研究结果表明,有必要进行更严格的研究,以解决理论识别、双指标规则、样本分布、缺失值处理、中介效应、区分效度、聚合效度、事后模型修正、等效模型问题和替代模型问题。需要从模型识别到模型重新设定进行稳健一致的方法学研究设计的进一步研究,以提高研究的效度。