[韩国护理研究中工具开发研究的有效性]
[Validity of instrument development research in korean nursing research].
作者信息
Lee Kyunghee, Shin Sujin
机构信息
Division of Nursing Science, College of Health Science, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Nursing, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea.
出版信息
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Dec;43(6):697-703. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.6.697.
PURPOSE
This integrative review study was done to analyze methods used for validation studies in Korean nursing research.
METHODS
In this study, the literature on instrument development in nursing research from Research Information Sharing Service (RISS) and major nursing journal databases in Korea were examined. The MeSH search terms included 'nursing', 'instrument', 'instrument development', 'validation' and 189 articles were included in the review.
RESULTS
The most frequently reported validity type was content validity, followed by construct validity, and criterion validity. One third reported a single type of validity, and 15% of the studies demonstrated three kinds of validity at the same time. In about 40% of the studies, both content and construct validity were examined.
CONCLUSION
The results of the study indicate that it is necessary to provide a wider variety of evidence to establish whether instruments are valid enough to use in nursing research.
目的
开展这项综合综述研究以分析韩国护理研究中用于验证性研究的方法。
方法
在本研究中，对韩国研究信息共享服务平台（RISS）以及主要护理期刊数据库中有关护理研究工具开发的文献进行了审查。医学主题词（MeSH）检索词包括“护理”“工具”“工具开发”“验证”，共有189篇文章纳入该综述。
结果
最常报告的效度类型是内容效度，其次是结构效度和效标效度。三分之一的研究报告了单一类型的效度，15%的研究同时展示了三种效度。约40%的研究同时检验了内容效度和结构效度。
结论
该研究结果表明，有必要提供更广泛的证据来确定工具在护理研究中使用是否足够有效。
Zotero 插件