Suppr超能文献

干扰电流对1级和2级压疮愈合的影响。

Impact of interferential current on recovery of pressure ulcers grade 1 and 2.

作者信息

Shahrokhi Akram, Ghorbani Azam, Aminianfar Atefeh

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery School, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

Qazvin Metabolic Disease Research Center, Qazvin University of Medical Sciences, Qazvin, Iran.

出版信息

Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014 Feb;19(7 Suppl 1):S91-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers' treatment imposes a considerable cost on health system and patients. Electrical stimulation has already been introduced as an effective method for promoting wound healing. This study was conducted to determine the impact of interferential current (IF) on healing of pressure ulcers (grade1 and 2).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this clinical trial, 23 patients (12 as cases and 11 as controls) were recruited. The study group was treated with IF daily for 10 days. IF current was applied via isoplanar current with a sweep frequency of 30-99 Hz and with tolerable intensity for 15-20 min. Before intervention, condition of the wounds was assessed and recorded. Routine characteristics of the ulcers in both groups were recorded before intervention (first day) and on the fifth and tenth days after intervention. SPSS (ver. 13) with paired t-test and Fisher's exact test was also used to analyze the data. A P-value of 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

According to one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, demographic characteristics, features of ulcer, as well as the intensity of pain were not significantly different between the study and control groups. All patients in the control and study groups were complaining of pain (7.25 ± 1.21 in the intervention group vs. 6.35 ± 1.28 in the control group). Ulcer size decreased significantly in the study group (P = 0.012) with a significant reduction in pain intensity (P = 0.000), amount of discharge (P = 0.008), and level of edema (P = 0.000), compared to controls.

CONCLUSION

As a first study in this field, the results showed that the use of IF current can accelerate pressure ulcer healing and reduce its size. As IF current can be considered as a deeper form of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS), it seems to be a safe method with no side effects.

摘要

背景

压疮的治疗给卫生系统和患者带来了相当大的成本。电刺激已被引入作为促进伤口愈合的有效方法。本研究旨在确定干扰电流(IF)对1级和2级压疮愈合的影响。

材料与方法

在这项临床试验中,招募了23名患者(12例为病例组,11例为对照组)。研究组每天接受10天的干扰电流治疗。干扰电流通过等平面电流施加,扫描频率为30 - 99Hz,强度可耐受,持续15 - 20分钟。干预前,对伤口状况进行评估并记录。在干预前(第一天)以及干预后第五天和第十天记录两组溃疡的常规特征。还使用SPSS(版本13)进行配对t检验和Fisher精确检验来分析数据。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

根据单样本Kolmogorov - Smirnov检验,研究组和对照组在人口统计学特征、溃疡特征以及疼痛强度方面无显著差异。对照组和研究组的所有患者均有疼痛主诉(干预组为7.25±1.21,对照组为6.35±1.28)。与对照组相比,研究组的溃疡大小显著减小(P = 0.012),疼痛强度、渗出量(P = 0.008)和水肿程度(P = 0.000)均显著降低。

结论

作为该领域的首次研究,结果表明使用干扰电流可加速压疮愈合并减小其大小。由于干扰电流可被视为经皮神经电刺激(TENS)的一种更深入形式,它似乎是一种安全且无副作用的方法。

相似文献

1
Impact of interferential current on recovery of pressure ulcers grade 1 and 2.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2014 Feb;19(7 Suppl 1):S91-6.
2
Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(3):1-203. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
3
Community-based care for chronic wound management: an evidence-based analysis.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(18):1-24. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
4
[Clinical efficacy and influencing factors of different modes of continuous negative pressure wound therapy on venous ulcer wounds of lower limbs].
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Dec 20;36(12):1149-1158. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20200316-00173.
6
Foam dressings for treating pressure ulcers.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 12;10(10):CD011332. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011332.pub2.

本文引用的文献

3
Intermittent electrical stimulation redistributes pressure and promotes tissue oxygenation in loaded muscles of individuals with spinal cord injury.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Jan;110(1):246-55. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00661.2010. Epub 2010 Sep 30.
4
The use of sensory electrical stimulation for pressure ulcer prevention.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2010 Nov;26(8):528-36. doi: 10.3109/09593981003587037. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
6
Treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review.
JAMA. 2008 Dec 10;300(22):2647-62. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.778.
10
The effects of home interferential therapy on post-operative pain, edema, and range of motion of the knee.
Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):16-20. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200301000-00004.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验