Suppr超能文献

评估不同放疗技术在治疗左侧乳腺癌时对心脏亚结构的照射情况。

Estimating cardiac substructures exposure from diverse radiotherapy techniques in treating left-sided breast cancer.

作者信息

Zhang Li, Mei Xin, Chen Xingxing, Hu Weigang, Hu Silong, Zhang Yingjian, Shao Zhimin, Guo Xiaomao, Tuan Jeffrey, Yu Xiaoli

机构信息

From the From the Department of Radiation Oncology (LZ, XM, XC,WH, XG, XY); Department of Nuclear Medicine (SH, YZ); Department of Breast Surgery(ZS), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; and Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore,Singapore, Singapore (JT).

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(18):e847. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000847.

Abstract

The study compares the physical and biologically effective doses (BED) received by the heart and cardiac substructures using three-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT), intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), and simple IMRT (s-IMRT) in postoperative radiotherapy for patients with left-sided breast cancer. From October 2008 to February 2009, 14 patients with histologically confirmed left-sided breast cancer were enrolled and underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) simulation and 18F-FDG positron emission tomography-CT to outline the left cardiac ventricle (LV) and other substructures. The linear-quadratic model was used to convert the physical doses received by critical points of inner heart to BED.The maximal dose, minimum dose, dose received by 99% of volume (D99) and dose received by 95% of volume (D95) in target areas were significantly better using IMRT and s-IMRT when compared with 3D-CRT (P < 0.05). IMRT and s-IMRT significantly reduced the maximal cardiac dose (5038.98 vs 5346.47 cGy, P = 0.002; 5146.66 vs 5346.47 cGy, P = 0.03). IMRT reduced the maximal dose to LV by 4% (P = 0.05) in comparison with 3D-CRT. The average doses to heart and LV in 3D-CRT plan were significantly lower than those in IMRT plan (P < 0.05). The average cardiac volumes receiving ≥25 Gy (V25 Gy) in IMRT, s-IMRT, and 3D-CRT plans were 73.98, 76.75, and 60.34 cm, respectively. The average LV volumes receiving ≥25 Gy (V25 Gy) in IMRT, s-IMRT and 3D-CRT plans were 23.37, 24.68, and 17.61 cm, respectively. In the IMRT plan, the mean BED to the critical points of inner heart located within the high physical dose area were substantially lower than in 3D-CRT or s-IMRT.Compared with 3D-CRT technique, IMRT and s-IMRT had superior target dose coverage and dose uniformity. IMRT significantly reduced the maximal RT dose to heart and LV. IMRT and s-IMRT techniques did not reduce the volume of heart and LV receiving high doses.

摘要

本研究比较了左侧乳腺癌患者术后放疗中,使用三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)、调强放疗(IMRT)和简易调强放疗(s-IMRT)时心脏及心脏亚结构所接受的物理剂量和生物等效剂量(BED)。2008年10月至2009年2月,纳入14例经组织学确诊的左侧乳腺癌患者,进行增强CT模拟和18F-FDG正电子发射断层扫描-CT,以勾勒左心室(LV)及其他亚结构。采用线性二次模型将心脏内部关键点所接受的物理剂量转换为BED。与3D-CRT相比,使用IMRT和s-IMRT时靶区的最大剂量、最小剂量、99%体积所接受的剂量(D99)和95%体积所接受的剂量(D95)均显著更优(P<0.05)。IMRT和s-IMRT显著降低了心脏最大剂量(5038.98 vs 5346.47 cGy,P = 0.002;5146.66 vs 5346.47 cGy,P = 0.03)。与3D-CRT相比,IMRT使左心室最大剂量降低了4%(P = 0.05)。3D-CRT计划中心脏和左心室的平均剂量显著低于IMRT计划(P<0.05)。IMRT、s-IMRT和3D-CRT计划中接受≥25 Gy(V25 Gy)的平均心脏体积分别为73.98、76.75和60.34 cm³。IMRT、s-IMRT和3D-CRT计划中接受≥25 Gy(V25 Gy)的平均左心室体积分别为23.37、24.68和17.61 cm³。在IMRT计划中,位于高物理剂量区域内的心脏内部关键点的平均BED显著低于3D-CRT或s-IMRT。与3D-CRT技术相比,IMRT和s-IMRT具有更好的靶区剂量覆盖和剂量均匀性。IMRT显著降低了心脏和左心室的最大放疗剂量。IMRT和s-IMRT技术并未减少接受高剂量照射的心脏和左心室体积。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验