Raschzok Nathanael, Reutzel-Selke Anja, Schmuck Rosa Bianca, Morgul Mehmet Haluk, Gauger Ulrich, Prabowo Kukuh Aji, Tannus Laura-Marie, Leder Annekatrin, Struecker Benjamin, Boas-Knoop Sabine, Bartels Michael, Jonas Sven, Lojewski Christian, Puhl Gero, Seehofer Daniel, Bahra Marcus, Pascher Andreas, Pratschke Johann, Sauer Igor Maximilian
General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Experimental Surgery and Regenerative Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Liver Transpl. 2015 Sep;21(9):1195-207. doi: 10.1002/lt.24164. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
The diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation is based on histological analysis of biopsies because noninvasive biomarkers for allograft rejection are not yet established for clinical routines. CD31, CD44, and chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand (CXCL) 9 have previously been described as biomarkers for cross-organ allograft rejection. Here, we assessed the predictive and diagnostic value of these proteins as serum biomarkers for clinically significant ACR in the first 6 months after liver transplantation in a prospective study. The protein levels were measured in 94 patients immediately before transplantation, at postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, 7, and 14 and when biopsies were performed during episodes of biochemical graft dysfunction. The CD44 serum protein levels were significantly lower at POD 1 in patients who experienced histologically proven ACR in the follow-up compared with patients without ACR (P < 0.001). CXCL9 was significantly higher before transplantation (P = 0.049) and at POD 1 (P < 0.001) in these patients. Low CD44 values (cutoff, <200.5 ng/mL) or high CXCL9 values (cutoff, >2.7 ng/mL) at POD 1 differentiated between rejection and no rejection with a sensitivity of 88% or 60% and a specificity of 61% or 79%, respectively. The combination of both biomarker cutoffs at POD 1 had a positive predictive value of 91% and a negative predictive value of 67% for clinically significant ACR. Moreover, CD44 was significantly lower at the time of ACR (P < 0.001) and differentiated the rejection group from patients with graft dysfunction due to other reasons. Our results suggest that CD44 and CXCL9 may serve as predictive biomarkers to identify liver allograft recipients at risk for clinically significant ACR.
肝移植后急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)的诊断基于活检组织学分析,因为用于临床常规的同种异体移植排斥反应的非侵入性生物标志物尚未确立。CD31、CD44和趋化因子(C-X-C基序)配体(CXCL)9先前已被描述为跨器官同种异体移植排斥反应的生物标志物。在此,我们在一项前瞻性研究中评估了这些蛋白质作为血清生物标志物对肝移植后前6个月内具有临床意义的ACR的预测和诊断价值。在94例患者移植前、术后第1、3、7和14天以及生化移植功能障碍发作期间进行活检时立即测量蛋白质水平。与无ACR的患者相比,随访中经组织学证实为ACR的患者在术后第1天的CD44血清蛋白水平显著降低(P < 0.001)。这些患者在移植前(P = 0.)和术后第1天(P < 0.001)CXCL9显著升高。术后第1天低CD44值(临界值,<200.5 ng/mL)或高CXCL9值(临界值,>2.7 ng/mL)可区分排斥反应和无排斥反应,敏感性分别为88%或60%,特异性分别为61%或79%。术后第1天两种生物标志物临界值的组合对具有临床意义的ACR的阳性预测值为91%,阴性预测值为67%。此外,ACR发生时CD44显著降低(P < 0.001),并将排斥反应组与因其他原因导致移植功能障碍的患者区分开来。我们的结果表明,CD44和CXCL9可作为预测性生物标志物,以识别有临床显著ACR风险的肝同种异体移植受者。