Thomas Samantha M, Kagan Courtney, Pavlovic Bryan J, Burnett Jonathan, Patterson Kristen, Pritchard Jonathan K, Gilad Yoav
Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Departments of Genetics and Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
PLoS Genet. 2015 May 7;11(5):e1005216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005216. eCollection 2015 May.
Renewable in vitro cell cultures, such as lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), have facilitated studies that contributed to our understanding of genetic influence on human traits. However, the degree to which cell lines faithfully maintain differences in donor-specific phenotypes is still debated. We have previously reported that standard cell line maintenance practice results in a loss of donor-specific gene expression signatures in LCLs. An alternative to the LCL model is the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) system, which carries the potential to model tissue-specific physiology through the use of differentiation protocols. Still, existing LCL banks represent an important source of starting material for iPSC generation, and it is possible that the disruptions in gene regulation associated with long-term LCL maintenance could persist through the reprogramming process. To address this concern, we studied the effect of reprogramming mature LCL cultures from six unrelated donors to iPSCs on the ensuing gene expression patterns within and between individuals. We show that the reprogramming process results in a recovery of donor-specific gene regulatory signatures, increasing the number of genes with a detectable donor effect by an order of magnitude. The proportion of variation in gene expression statistically attributed to donor increases from 6.9% in LCLs to 24.5% in iPSCs (P < 10-15). Since environmental contributions are unlikely to be a source of individual variation in our system of highly passaged cultured cell lines, our observations suggest that the effect of genotype on gene regulation is more pronounced in iPSCs than in LCLs. Our findings indicate that iPSCs can be a powerful model system for studies of phenotypic variation across individuals in general, and the genetic association with variation in gene regulation in particular. We further conclude that LCLs are an appropriate starting material for iPSC generation.
可再生的体外细胞培养物,如淋巴母细胞系(LCLs),推动了相关研究,有助于我们理解基因对人类性状的影响。然而,细胞系在多大程度上忠实地维持供体特异性表型差异仍存在争议。我们之前报道过,标准的细胞系维持方法会导致LCLs中供体特异性基因表达特征的丧失。LCL模型的一种替代方法是诱导多能干细胞(iPSC)系统,该系统有潜力通过使用分化方案来模拟组织特异性生理学。尽管如此,现有的LCL库是生成iPSC的重要起始材料来源,并且与长期LCL维持相关的基因调控破坏可能会在重编程过程中持续存在。为了解决这一问题,我们研究了将来自六个无关供体的成熟LCL培养物重编程为iPSC对个体内部和个体之间随后的基因表达模式的影响。我们表明,重编程过程导致供体特异性基因调控特征的恢复,使具有可检测到的供体效应的基因数量增加了一个数量级。在统计学上归因于供体的基因表达变异比例从LCLs中的6.9%增加到iPSCs中的24.5%(P < 10-15)。由于在我们的高传代培养细胞系系统中,环境因素不太可能是个体变异的来源,我们的观察结果表明,基因型对基因调控的影响在iPSCs中比在LCLs中更明显。我们的研究结果表明,iPSCs总体上可以成为研究个体间表型变异,特别是基因调控变异的遗传关联的强大模型系统。我们进一步得出结论,LCLs是生成iPSC的合适起始材料。