Marks Jennifer, Barnett Lisa M, Strugnell Claudia, Allender Steven
WHO Collaborating Centre for Obesity Prevention, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Burwood, Australia.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 May 8;12:59. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0218-0.
There is little empirical evidence of the impact of transition from primary to secondary school on obesity-related risk behaviour. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of a change of school system on physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour in pre-early adolescents.
Fifteen schools in Victoria, Australia were recruited at random from the bottom two strata of a five level socio-economic scale. In nine schools, students in year 6 primary school transitioned to a different school for year 7 secondary school, while in six schools (combined primary-secondary), students remained in the same school environment from year 6 to year 7. Time 1 (T1) measures were collected from students (N=245) in year 6 (age 11-13). Time 2 (T2) data were collected from 243 (99%) of the original student cohort when in year 7. PA and sedentary behaviour data were collected objectively (via ActiGraph accelerometer) and subjectively (via child self-report recall questionnaire). School environment data were collected via school staff survey. Change of behaviour analyses were conducted longitudinally i) for all students and ii) by change/no change of school. Mixed model regression analysis tested for behavioural interaction effects of changing/not changing school.
Sixty-three percent (N=152) changed schools from T1 to T2. Across all students we observed declines in average daily moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) (-4 min) and light PA (-23 min), and increases in average daily sedentary behaviour (16 min), weekday leisure screen time (17 min) and weekday homework screen time (25 min), all P<0.05. Compared to students who remained in the same school environment, students who changed school reported a greater reduction in PA intensity at recess and lunch, less likelihood to cycle to/from school, greater increase in weekday (41 mins) and weekend (45 mins) leisure screen time (P<0.05) and greater encouragement to participate in sport. School staff surveys identified that sport participation encouragement was greater in primary and combined primary-secondary than secondary schools (P<0.05).
Transitioning from primary to secondary school negatively impacts on children's PA and sedentary behaviour, and has further compounding effects on behaviour type by changing school environments.
关于从小学过渡到中学对肥胖相关风险行为的影响,几乎没有实证证据。本研究的目的是探讨学校系统的变化对青春期前儿童身体活动(PA)和久坐行为的影响。
从澳大利亚维多利亚州社会经济五级量表中排名最靠后的两个层级中随机抽取15所学校。在9所学校中,小学六年级的学生升入不同的学校读七年级,而在6所(九年一贯制)学校中,学生从六年级到七年级都留在同一学校环境中。从六年级(年龄11 - 13岁)的学生(N = 245)中收集时间1(T1)测量数据。当学生升入七年级时,从原学生队列中的243名(99%)学生那里收集时间2(T2)数据。通过客观方式(使用ActiGraph加速度计)和主观方式(通过儿童自我报告回忆问卷)收集PA和久坐行为数据。通过对学校工作人员的调查收集学校环境数据。对所有学生纵向进行行为变化分析,以及按是否转学进行行为变化分析。混合模型回归分析检验了转学与否对行为的交互作用影响。
63%(N = 152)的学生从T1到T2时转学。在所有学生中,我们观察到平均每日中度至剧烈身体活动(MVPA)减少(-4分钟),轻度PA减少(-23分钟),平均每日久坐行为增加(16分钟),工作日休闲屏幕时间增加(17分钟),工作日家庭作业屏幕时间增加(25分钟),所有P < 0.05。与留在同一学校环境的学生相比,转学的学生课间休息和午餐时的PA强度下降幅度更大,骑车上下学的可能性更小,工作日(41分钟)和周末(45分钟)休闲屏幕时间增加幅度更大(P < 0.05),并且受到更多参与体育运动的鼓励。学校工作人员调查发现,小学和九年一贯制学校比中学更鼓励学生参与体育运动(P < 0.05)。
从小学过渡到中学对儿童的PA和久坐行为产生负面影响,并且通过改变学校环境对行为类型产生进一步的复合影响。