Suppr超能文献

旨在增加儿童身体活动、减少久坐行为和增加水果与蔬菜摄入量的干预措施对儿童的影响:积极生活 5 年(AFLY5)基于学校的群组随机对照试验。

Effect of intervention aimed at increasing physical activity, reducing sedentary behaviour, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in children: active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) school based cluster randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK.

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2014 May 27;348:g3256. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3256.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of a school based intervention to increase physical activity, reduce sedentary behaviour, and increase fruit and vegetable consumption in children.

DESIGN

Cluster randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

60 primary schools in the south west of England.

PARTICIPANTS

Primary school children who were in school year 4 (age 8-9 years) at recruitment and baseline assessment, in year 5 during the intervention, and at the end of year 5 (age 9-10) at follow-up assessment.

INTERVENTION

The Active for Life Year 5 (AFLY5) intervention consisted of teacher training, provision of lesson and child-parent interactive homework plans, all materials required for lessons and homework, and written materials for school newsletters and parents. The intervention was delivered when children were in school year 5 (age 9-10 years). Schools allocated to control received standard teaching.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The pre-specified primary outcomes were accelerometer assessed minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per day, accelerometer assessed minutes of sedentary behaviour per day, and reported daily consumption of servings of fruit and vegetables.

RESULTS

60 schools with more than 2221 children were recruited; valid data were available for fruit and vegetable consumption for 2121 children, for accelerometer assessed physical activity and sedentary behaviour for 1252 children, and for secondary outcomes for between 1825 and 2212 children for the main analyses. None of the three primary outcomes differed between children in schools allocated to the AFLY5 intervention and those allocated to the control group. The difference in means comparing the intervention group with the control group was -1.35 (95% confidence interval -5.29 to 2.59) minutes per day for moderate to vigorous physical activity, -0.11 (-9.71 to 9.49) minutes per day for sedentary behaviour, and 0.08 (-0.12 to 0.28) servings per day for fruit and vegetable consumption. The intervention was effective for three out of nine of the secondary outcomes after multiple testing was taken into account: self reported time spent in screen viewing at the weekend (-21 (-37 to -4) minutes per day), self reported servings of snacks per day (-0.22 (-0.38 to -0.05)), and servings of high energy drinks per day (-0.26 (-0.43 to -0.10)) were all reduced. Results from a series of sensitivity analyses testing different assumptions about missing data and from per protocol analyses produced similar results.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that the AFLY5 school based intervention is not effective at increasing levels of physical activity, decreasing sedentary behaviour, and increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in primary school children. Change in these activities may require more intensive behavioural interventions with children or upstream interventions at the family and societal level, as well as at the school environment level. These findings have relevance for researchers, policy makers, public health practitioners, and doctors who are involved in health promotion, policy making, and commissioning services. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN50133740.

摘要

目的

探究一项基于学校的干预措施对增加儿童身体活动、减少久坐行为和增加水果与蔬菜摄入量的效果。

设计

整群随机对照试验。

设置

英格兰西南部的 60 所小学。

参与者

在招募和基线评估时处于学校 4 年级(8-9 岁)、在干预期间处于 5 年级、在随访评估时处于 5 年级末(9-10 岁)的小学生。

干预措施

Active for Life Year 5(AFLY5)干预措施包括教师培训、提供课程和儿童-家长互动作业计划、所有课程和作业所需的材料以及学校通讯和家长用书面材料。干预措施在儿童 5 年级(9-10 岁)时进行。分配到对照组的学校接受标准教学。

主要结局测量指标

预先指定的主要结局指标为每天中度至剧烈体力活动的加速度计评估分钟数、每天久坐行为的加速度计评估分钟数以及报告的每日水果和蔬菜摄入量。

结果

招募了 60 所拥有超过 2221 名儿童的学校;2121 名儿童的水果和蔬菜摄入量、1252 名儿童的加速度计评估体力活动和久坐行为以及 1825 至 2212 名儿童的次要结局的有效数据均可用于主要分析。与分配到 AFLY5 干预组的儿童相比,分配到对照组的儿童在这三个主要结局指标上没有差异。干预组与对照组相比的平均差值为:中度至剧烈体力活动增加 1.35(95%置信区间-5.29 至 2.59)分钟/天、久坐行为减少 0.11(-9.71 至 9.49)分钟/天、水果和蔬菜摄入量增加 0.08(-0.12 至 0.28)份/天。在考虑多次测试后,该干预措施对九个次要结局中的三个具有有效性:周末自我报告的屏幕观看时间减少了 21(-37 至-4)分钟/天)、自我报告的每日零食份数减少了 0.22(-0.38 至-0.05))以及每日高能量饮料份数减少了 0.26(-0.43 至-0.10))。对缺失数据进行了一系列敏感性分析和按方案分析,得到了类似的结果。

结论

研究结果表明,AFLY5 基于学校的干预措施对增加小学生的身体活动水平、减少久坐行为和增加水果与蔬菜摄入量没有效果。这些活动的变化可能需要对儿童进行更强化的行为干预,或者在家庭和社会层面以及学校环境层面进行上游干预。这些研究结果对参与健康促进、政策制定和服务委托的研究人员、政策制定者、公共卫生从业者和医生具有重要意义。

试验注册

当前对照试验 ISRCTN50133740。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d158/4793634/5832b07f3647/kipr017462.f1_default.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验