Duchin Kyla S, Asefzadeh Baharak, Poulaki Vasiliki, Rett Douglas, Marescalchi Paul, Cavallerano Anthony
*OD, MS, FAAO †MD, PhD ‡OD, FAAO VA Maine Healthcare System, Augusta, Maine (KSD); and VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts (BA, VP, DR, PM, AC).
Optom Vis Sci. 2015 Jun;92(6):714-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000598.
The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity for detection of referable age-related macular degeneration (AMD) using an existing nonmydriatic telemedicine pathway for diabetic retinopathy screening with comparison to same-day face-to-face examination by a retina specialist.
Subjects in this study underwent nonmydriatic and mydriatic digital retinal imaging on the same day as stereoscopic dilated examination of the macula by a retina specialist and the level of AMD was recorded for each eye. Images were graded by two trained readers as nonreferable or referable (AREDS [Age-Related Eye Disease Study] grading of level 3 or greater). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing referral recommendations between each reader and the retina specialist ("gold standard").
There were 47 subjects (94 eyes) enrolled in the study. Sensitivity for nonreferable AMD with nonmydriatic imaging was 1.0 (reader 1) and 1.0 (reader 2), whereas specificity was 0.75 (reader 1) and 0.91 (reader 2). Sensitivity for referable AMD with nonmydriatic imaging was 0.84 (reader 1) and 0.88 (reader 2), whereas specificity was 0.81 (reader 1) and 0.81 (reader 2).
Our study showed that nonmydriatic digital retinal imaging had excellent sensitivity and specificity in identifying referable and nonreferable AMD using an existing validated telemedicine pathway for diabetic retinopathy screening.
本研究旨在通过现有的用于糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的非散瞳远程医疗途径,确定检测可转诊的年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)的敏感性和特异性,并与视网膜专科医生同日面对面检查进行比较。
本研究中的受试者在同一天接受了非散瞳和散瞳数字视网膜成像,同时视网膜专科医生对黄斑进行了立体散瞳检查,并记录了每只眼睛的AMD水平。图像由两名经过培训的阅片者分级为不可转诊或可转诊(年龄相关性眼病研究[AREDS]3级或更高分级)。通过比较每位阅片者与视网膜专科医生(“金标准”)之间的转诊建议来计算敏感性和特异性。
本研究共纳入47名受试者(94只眼)。非散瞳成像检测不可转诊AMD的敏感性,阅片者1为1.0,阅片者2为1.0;特异性方面,阅片者1为0.75,阅片者2为0.91。非散瞳成像检测可转诊AMD的敏感性,阅片者1为0.84,阅片者2为0.88;特异性方面,阅片者1为0.81,阅片者2为0.81。
我们的研究表明,使用现有的经过验证的用于糖尿病视网膜病变筛查的远程医疗途径,非散瞳数字视网膜成像在识别可转诊和不可转诊的AMD方面具有出色的敏感性和特异性。