• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

门诊诊断为肺炎的儿童中β-内酰胺类与大环内酯类单药治疗的比较疗效

Comparative Effectiveness of Beta-lactam Versus Macrolide Monotherapy in Children with Pneumonia Diagnosed in the Outpatient Setting.

作者信息

Ambroggio Lilliam, Test Matthew, Metlay Joshua P, Graf Thomas R, Blosky Mary Ann, Macaluso Maurizio, Shah Samir S

机构信息

From the *Division of Hospital Medicine, †Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; ‡General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; §Population Health, Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania; ¶Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio; and ‖Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Aug;34(8):839-42. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000740.

DOI:10.1097/INF.0000000000000740
PMID:25955834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4573783/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most children diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are treated in the outpatient setting. The objective of this study was to determine the comparative clinical effectiveness of beta-lactam monotherapy and macrolide monotherapy in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

Children, 1-18 years old, with a clinical diagnosis of CAP at an outpatient practice affiliated (n = 71) with Geisinger Health System during January 1, 2008 to January 31, 2010 were eligible. The primary exposure was receipt of beta-lactam or macrolide monotherapy. The primary outcome was treatment failure defined as change in antibiotic prescription within 14 days of the initial pneumonia diagnosis. Propensity scores were used to determine the likelihood of receiving macrolide monotherapy. Treatment groups were matched 1:1, based on propensity score, age group and asthma status. Multivariable conditional logistic regression models estimated the association between macrolide monotherapy and treatment failures.

RESULTS

Of 1999 children with CAP, 1164 were matched. In the matched cohorts, 24% of children had asthma. Patients who received macrolide monotherapy had no statistical difference in treatment failure regardless of age when compared with patients who received beta-lactam monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that children diagnosed with CAP in the outpatient setting and treated with beta-lactam or macrolide monotherapy have the same likelihood to fail treatment regardless of age.

摘要

背景

大多数被诊断为社区获得性肺炎(CAP)的儿童在门诊接受治疗。本研究的目的是确定β-内酰胺单药治疗和大环内酯单药治疗在该人群中的相对临床疗效。

研究设计

纳入2008年1月1日至2010年1月31日期间在与盖辛格医疗系统相关的门诊诊所(n = 71)临床诊断为CAP的1 - 18岁儿童。主要暴露因素是接受β-内酰胺或大环内酯单药治疗。主要结局是治疗失败,定义为在初始肺炎诊断后14天内抗生素处方的改变。使用倾向评分来确定接受大环内酯单药治疗的可能性。根据倾向评分、年龄组和哮喘状态将治疗组进行1:1匹配。多变量条件逻辑回归模型估计大环内酯单药治疗与治疗失败之间的关联。

结果

1999例CAP儿童中,1164例进行了匹配。在匹配队列中,24%的儿童患有哮喘。与接受β-内酰胺单药治疗的患者相比,接受大环内酯单药治疗的患者无论年龄大小,治疗失败率均无统计学差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在门诊被诊断为CAP并接受β-内酰胺或大环内酯单药治疗的儿童,无论年龄大小,治疗失败的可能性相同。

相似文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Beta-lactam Versus Macrolide Monotherapy in Children with Pneumonia Diagnosed in the Outpatient Setting.门诊诊断为肺炎的儿童中β-内酰胺类与大环内酯类单药治疗的比较疗效
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2015 Aug;34(8):839-42. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000740.
2
Beta-lactam versus beta- lactam/macrolide therapy in pediatric outpatient pneumonia.β-内酰胺类药物与β-内酰胺类/大环内酯类药物治疗小儿门诊肺炎的对比
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 May;51(5):541-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23312. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
Comparative effectiveness of empiric β-lactam monotherapy and β-lactam-macrolide combination therapy in children hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia.经验性β-内酰胺单药治疗与β-内酰胺-大环内酯类联合治疗对儿童社区获得性肺炎住院患者的疗效比较。
J Pediatr. 2012 Dec;161(6):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.06.067. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
4
Effectiveness of β-Lactam Monotherapy vs Macrolide Combination Therapy for Children Hospitalized With Pneumonia.β-内酰胺单药治疗与大环内酯类联合治疗对肺炎住院儿童的有效性
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Dec 1;171(12):1184-1191. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.3225.
5
Comparative Efficacy of Beta-Lactams and Macrolides in the Treatment of Pediatric Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.β-内酰胺类和大环内酯类药物治疗儿童肺炎的疗效比较:系统评价。
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2020;16(4):307-313. doi: 10.2174/1573396316666200907115800.
6
Cost-effectiveness of antibiotic treatment strategies for community-acquired pneumonia: results from a cluster randomized cross-over trial.社区获得性肺炎抗生素治疗策略的成本效益:一项整群随机交叉试验的结果
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jan 10;17(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2179-6.
7
Treatment failure rates and health care utilization and costs among patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with levofloxacin or macrolides in an outpatient setting: a retrospective claims database analysis.门诊环境中接受左氧氟沙星或大环内酯类药物治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的治疗失败率、医疗保健利用情况及成本:一项回顾性索赔数据库分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):358-71. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.01.023.
8
β-Lactam monotherapy vs β-lactam-macrolide combination treatment in moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized noninferiority trial.β-内酰胺单药治疗与β-内酰胺-大环内酯类药物联合治疗中度社区获得性肺炎的随机非劣效性试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1894-901. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4887.
9
Adjunct Systemic Corticosteroid Therapy in Children With Community-Acquired Pneumonia in the Outpatient Setting.门诊环境下社区获得性肺炎患儿的辅助全身皮质类固醇治疗
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2015 Mar;4(1):21-7. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piu017. Epub 2014 Mar 27.
10
Effect of β-Lactam Plus Macrolide Versus Fluoroquinolone on 30-Day Readmissions for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.β-内酰胺类联合大环内酯类与氟喹诺酮类药物对社区获得性肺炎 30 天再入院的影响。
Am J Ther. 2020 Mar/Apr;27(2):e177-e182. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000788.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment of mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia in previously healthy children: an Italian intersociety consensus (SIPPS-SIP-SITIP-FIMP-SIAIP-SIMRI-FIMMG-SIMG).意大利多学会共识(SIPPS-SIP-SITIP-FIMP-SIAIP-SIMRI-FIMMG-SIMG):对既往健康儿童中轻度至中度社区获得性肺炎的治疗。
Ital J Pediatr. 2024 Oct 19;50(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s13052-024-01786-8.
2
Variation in Antibiotic Treatment Failure Outcome Definitions in Randomised Trials and Observational Studies of Antibiotic Prescribing Strategies: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis.抗生素处方策略随机试验和观察性研究中抗生素治疗失败结局定义的差异:一项系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 May 6;11(5):627. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11050627.
3
Antibiotic Choice and Clinical Outcomes in Ambulatory Children with Community-Acquired Pneumonia.门诊儿童社区获得性肺炎的抗生素选择与临床结局。
J Pediatr. 2021 Feb;229:207-215.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.10.005. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
4
Antibiotic Use and Outcomes in Children in the Emergency Department With Suspected Pneumonia.抗生素在疑似肺炎急诊科儿童中的使用与结局。
Pediatrics. 2020 Apr;145(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3138. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
Childhood community-acquired pneumonia: A review of etiology- and antimicrobial treatment studies.儿童社区获得性肺炎:病因和抗菌治疗研究综述。
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2018 Mar;26:41-48. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 15.
6
Recent Developments in Pediatric Community-Acquired Pneumonia.儿童社区获得性肺炎的最新进展
Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016 May;18(5):14. doi: 10.1007/s11908-016-0521-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Short-course antibiotic treatment for community-acquired alveolar pneumonia in ambulatory children: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.短程抗生素治疗门诊儿童社区获得性肺泡性肺炎:一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2014 Feb;33(2):136-42. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000023.
2
Epidemiology and etiology of childhood pneumonia in 2010: estimates of incidence, severe morbidity, mortality, underlying risk factors and causative pathogens for 192 countries.2010 年儿童肺炎的流行病学和病因学:192 个国家的发病率、严重发病、死亡率、潜在危险因素和病原体的估计。
J Glob Health. 2013 Jun;3(1):010401. doi: 10.7189/jogh.03.010401.
3
Clinical symptoms and signs for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in children and adolescents with community-acquired pneumonia.儿童和青少年社区获得性肺炎中肺炎支原体诊断的临床症状和体征
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10(10):CD009175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009175.pub2.
4
The management of community-acquired pneumonia in infants and children older than 3 months of age: clinical practice guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America.儿童社区获得性肺炎管理:儿童传染病学会和美国传染病学会临床实践指南(适用于 3 个月以上的婴儿和儿童)。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;53(7):e25-76. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir531. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
5
Ambulatory visit rates and antibiotic prescribing for children with pneumonia, 1994-2007.1994-2007 年儿童肺炎的门诊就诊率和抗生素处方率。
Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):411-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2008. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
6
Indications for propensity scores and review of their use in pharmacoepidemiology.倾向评分的适应症及其在药物流行病学中的应用综述。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006 Mar;98(3):253-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_293.x.
7
Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.非均匀效应条件下多变量逻辑回归、倾向匹配、倾向调整和基于倾向加权的结果。
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb 1;163(3):262-70. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj047. Epub 2005 Dec 21.
8
Comparative efficacy of amoxicillin, cefuroxime and clarithromycin in the treatment of community -acquired pneumonia in children.阿莫西林、头孢呋辛和克拉霉素治疗儿童社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2003 Dec;13(12):704-7.
9
Principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research: a systematic literature review.医学研究中倾向得分建模的原则:一项系统的文献综述。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Dec;13(12):841-53. doi: 10.1002/pds.969.
10
Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of community-acquired pneumonia in hospitalized children.住院儿童社区获得性肺炎的流行病学及临床特征
Pediatrics. 2004 Apr;113(4):701-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.701.