Moreno C A, Realini J P
Tex Med. 1989 Dec;85(12):37-40.
We conducted a retrospective evaluation of 442 infant circumcisions performed in an ambulatory setting. Procedures done with the Gomco clamp (Gomco Division, Allied Health Care, Buffalo, NY) and the Plastibell device (Hollister, Inc, Libertyville, Ill) were compared with respect to the frequency of complications. The overall complication rate was 6.8%. Bleeding requiring action by a physician occurred in 3.4% of cases and was significantly more common with the Gomco clamp than with the Plastibell device (p less than 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two methods in the rate of infection or other complications. The rate of complications is comparable to previous studies of inpatient circumcision.
我们对在门诊环境中进行的442例婴儿包皮环切术进行了回顾性评估。将使用Gomco夹（纽约州布法罗市联合医疗保健公司Gomco分部）和Plastibell装置（伊利诺伊州利伯蒂维尔市霍利斯特公司）进行的手术在并发症发生率方面进行了比较。总体并发症发生率为6.8%。需要医生采取措施的出血在3.4%的病例中发生，并且使用Gomco夹比使用Plastibell装置明显更常见（p小于0.05）。两种方法在感染率或其他并发症方面没有统计学上的显著差异。并发症发生率与先前关于住院包皮环切术的研究相当。
