Suppr超能文献

新生儿包皮环切术中阴茎背神经阻滞的安全性。

The safety of dorsal penile nerve block for neonatal circumcision.

作者信息

Fontaine P, Dittberner D, Scheltema K E

机构信息

Department of Family Practice and Community Health, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1994 Sep;39(3):243-8.

PMID:8077903
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) was first described for use in neonatal circumcision in 1978. Since then, many studies have documented its effectiveness in alleviating pain in newborns undergoing circumcision. In 1989, the American Academy of Pediatrics acknowledged that DPNB may relieve the pain and stress of circumcision but stopped short of endorsing its routine use in this procedure, citing lack of data on its safety.

METHODS

To determine the types and rates of complications from DPNB used for neonatal circumcision, the authors conducted a retrospective review of hospital records of 1358 circumcised male infants delivered at an urban medical center during a 1-year period.

RESULTS

Of the 1358 records reviewed, 1222 (90%) had sufficient documentation to be included in the study. DPNB was used in 1022 (84%) of the circumcisions. Complications occurred in 12 cases (11 with small ecchymoses at injection sites and one with excessive bleeding from the needle stick), for a rate of 1.2%. No cases of lidocaine toxicity, voiding delay, or vascular compromise were noted. There was a trend toward increased incidence of injection-site hematomas with the Plastibell as compared with the Gomco technique (P = .07). There were no significant differences in complication rates for DPNB performed by less experienced operators (eg, medical students and residents) compared with more experienced operators (staff physicians).

CONCLUSIONS

This study corroborates findings of smaller case studies, indicating that DPNB is associated with a low rate of minor complications.

摘要

背景

阴茎背神经阻滞(DPNB)于1978年首次被描述用于新生儿包皮环切术。从那时起,许多研究记录了其在减轻接受包皮环切术新生儿疼痛方面的有效性。1989年,美国儿科学会承认DPNB可能减轻包皮环切术的疼痛和压力,但由于缺乏其安全性数据,未支持在该手术中常规使用。

方法

为确定用于新生儿包皮环切术的DPNB的并发症类型和发生率,作者对一家城市医疗中心在1年期间分娩的1358例接受包皮环切术男婴的医院记录进行了回顾性研究。

结果

在审查的1358份记录中,1222份(90%)有足够的文件资料可纳入研究。1022例(84%)包皮环切术使用了DPNB。12例发生并发症(11例注射部位有小瘀斑,1例针刺处出血过多),发生率为1.2%。未发现利多卡因中毒、排尿延迟或血管受损的病例。与Gomco技术相比,使用Plastibell时注射部位血肿的发生率有增加趋势(P = 0.07)。经验不足的操作者(如医学生和住院医师)进行的DPNB与经验更丰富的操作者(主治医师)相比,并发症发生率无显著差异。

结论

本研究证实了较小病例研究的结果,表明DPNB相关的轻微并发症发生率较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验