Wolf Michael, Saenen Johan B, Bories Wim, Miljoen Hielko P, Nullens Sara, Vrints Christiaan J, Sarkozy Andrea
Department of Cardiology, Antwerp University Hospital, Wilrijkstraat 10, 2650, Edegem, Belgium,
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Sep;43(3):287-96. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0006-4. Epub 2015 May 9.
Use of online contact force (CF) measurement during circumferential pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (CPVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has demonstrated improvements in procedural parameters and mid-term clinical outcome. However, it is unknown if experience gained with CF measuring catheters improves the efficacy of subsequent CPVI procedures performed without CF measurement.
This prospective trial compared procedural results of CPVI performed without a CF measuring catheter to a control group performed with a CF measuring catheter, by an operator with prior experience with CF technology..
Thirty-six eligible paroxysmal (n = 27) or persistent (n = 9) AF patients were consecutively enrolled. Twelve patients underwent CPVI with the non-CF catheter (CF- group) in a recall period and 24 with the CF catheter (CF+ group). After the first circumferential lesion set, the number of PV pairs requiring additional touch-up lesions to achieve electrical isolation was significantly less in the CF+ group (2 of 48 (4.2 %) vs. 7 of 24 (29.2 %) in the CF+ and CF- groups, respectively, p = 0.005). The procedure time was significantly lower in the CF+ group (117.9 ± 23.3 vs. 134.1 ± 25.3 min, p = 0.033). Radiofrequency (RF) and fluoroscopy time did not differ between groups (31.5 ± 7.1 vs. 31.8 ± 7.0 min and 11.8 ± 5.6 vs. 11.0 ± 5.8 min in the CF+ and the CF- group, respectively)
With the use of online CF measurement, PV isolation is more frequently complete following the first circumferential lesion set. A previous learning period with direct CF feedback is not a substitute for real-time direct CF measurement to maintain this advantage.
在心房颤动(AF)的环肺静脉(PV)隔离(CPVI)过程中使用在线接触力(CF)测量已显示出程序参数和中期临床结果有所改善。然而,尚不清楚使用CF测量导管所积累的经验是否能提高后续不使用CF测量进行的CPVI手术的疗效。
这项前瞻性试验将一名有CF技术经验的操作者在不使用CF测量导管的情况下进行CPVI的手术结果与使用CF测量导管的对照组进行了比较。
连续纳入36例符合条件的阵发性(n = 27)或持续性(n = 9)AF患者。在回顾期内,12例患者使用非CF导管进行CPVI(CF-组),24例患者使用CF导管进行CPVI(CF+组)。在第一次环周消融后,CF+组中需要额外补点消融以实现电隔离的PV对数量明显更少(CF+组为48对中的2对(4.2%),CF-组为24对中的7对(29.2%),p = 0.005)。CF+组的手术时间明显更短(117.9±23.3分钟对134.1±25.3分钟,p = 0.033)。两组之间的射频(RF)和透视时间无差异(CF+组和CF-组分别为31.5±7.1分钟对31.8±7.0分钟和11.8±5.6分钟对11.0±5.8分钟)
使用在线CF测量时,首次环周消融后PV隔离更常能完成。先前有直接CF反馈的学习期并不能替代实时直接CF测量来维持这一优势。