Nozaki Taiki, Kaneko Yasuhito, Yu Hon J, Kaneshiro Kayleigh, Schwarzkopf Ran, Yoshioka Hiroshi
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA.
Eur J Radiol. 2015 Jul;84(7):1299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.03.029. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
To investigate the difference in T1rho profiles of the entire femoral cartilage between SPGR and b-FFE sequences at 3.0T.
20 healthy volunteers were enrolled in this study. T1rho images of each subject were acquired with two types of pulse sequences: SPGR and b-FFE. Femoral cartilage segmentation was performed by two independent raters slice-by-slice using Matlab. Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility between the two imaging protocols was calculated. The relative signal intensity (SI) of cartilage, subchondral bone marrow, joint effusion, and the relative signal contrast between structures of the knee were quantitatively measured. The difference in T1rho values between SPGR and b-FFE sequences was statistically analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
The average T1rho value of the entire femoral cartilage with b-FFE was significantly higher compared to SPGR (p<0.05). The reproducibility of the segmented area and T1rho values was superior with SPGR compared to b-FFE. The inter-class correlation coefficient was 0.846 on SPGR and 0.824 on b-FFE. The intra-class correlation coefficient of T1rho values was 0.878 on SPGR and 0.836 on b-FFE. The two imaging techniques demonstrated different signal and contrast characteristics. The relative SI of fluid was significantly higher on SPGR, while the relative SI of subchondral bone was significantly higher on b-FFE (p<0.001). There were also significant differences in the relative contrast between fluid-cartilage, fluid-subchondral bone, and cartilage-subchondral bone between the two sequences (all p<0.001).
We need to pay attention to differences in T1rho values between SPGR and b-FFE in clinical applications.
研究在3.0T场强下,扰相梯度回波(SPGR)序列和平衡式快速场回波(b-FFE)序列在整个股骨软骨T1rho成像特征上的差异。
招募20名健康志愿者。使用SPGR和b-FFE两种脉冲序列采集每位受试者的T1rho图像。由两名独立的评估者使用Matlab逐片进行股骨软骨分割。计算两种成像方案之间的观察者间和观察者内的可重复性。定量测量软骨、软骨下骨髓、关节积液的相对信号强度(SI)以及膝关节各结构之间的相对信号对比度。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验对SPGR和b-FFE序列之间的T1rho值差异进行统计学分析。
与SPGR序列相比,b-FFE序列下整个股骨软骨的平均T1rho值显著更高(p<0.05)。与b-FFE序列相比,SPGR序列在分割区域和T1rho值方面的可重复性更好。组间相关系数在SPGR序列上为0.846,在b-FFE序列上为0.824。T1rho值的组内相关系数在SPGR序列上为0.878,在b-FFE序列上为0.836。两种成像技术表现出不同的信号和对比度特征。SPGR序列上液体的相对SI显著更高,而b-FFE序列上软骨下骨的相对SI显著更高(p<0.001)。两个序列在液体-软骨、液体-软骨下骨和软骨-软骨下骨之间的相对对比度上也存在显著差异(均p<0.001)。
在临床应用中,我们需要注意SPGR和b-FFE序列在T1rho值上的差异。