Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Musculoskeletal Disease and Pain, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 Sep;36(9):2109-2119. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3645-2. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
T1 rho and T2 mapping are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to detect early degenerative changes in cartilage. Recent advancements have enabled 3D acquisition for both techniques. The objective of the present study was to examine the correlation of 3D T1 rho and 3D T2 mapping with macroscopic and histological characteristics of knee cartilage. Twenty-one patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis with involvement of the medial compartment but with minimum involvement of the lateral compartment were enrolled. Prior to surgery, five series of MRI were acquired with a 3-T scanner. 3D T1 rho/T2 analyses were performed following determination of regions to be assessed using in-house software that incorporated three series of MRI acquisitions data (3D-MERGE, 3D-SPGR, and 3D-CUBE). During surgery, the cartilage of the lateral compartment was macroscopically assessed with the International Cartilage Research Society (ICRS) articular classification system. The extracted specimens were histologically assessed using the OARSI histology score. Three regions of interest (ROI) were assessed for each slice (two slices per knee): the central lateral femoral condyle (cLFC), the posterior portion of the lateral femoral condyle (pLFC), and the lateral tibia plateau (LTP). For each ROI, the mean T1 rho and T2 relaxation time, the ICRS grade, and the OARSI score were compared. Neither the T1 rho nor the T2 reflected the macroscopic grading. The T1 rho could discriminate between histological grades 1 and 2. However, the T2 could not. The T1 rho relaxation time was higher in the pLFC than in the cLFC even in the same grade. Compared to T2 mapping, T1 rho mapping may have an advantage in differentiating grades I and II cartilage degeneration on OARSI histological grading system.
T1 rho 和 T2 映射是磁共振成像 (MRI) 技术,用于检测软骨的早期退行性变化。最近的进展使这两种技术都能够进行 3D 采集。本研究的目的是检查 3D T1 rho 和 3D T2 映射与膝关节软骨的宏观和组织学特征的相关性。21 例因骨关节炎导致内侧间室受累但外侧间室受累最小的患者接受了全膝关节置换术。在手术前,使用 3T 扫描仪采集了五组 MRI。使用内部软件进行 3D T1 rho/T2 分析,该软件整合了三系列 MRI 采集数据(3D-MERGE、3D-SPGR 和 3D-CUBE)来确定要评估的区域。在手术过程中,使用国际软骨研究协会 (ICRS) 关节分类系统对外侧间室的软骨进行宏观评估。提取的标本使用 OARSI 组织学评分进行组织学评估。对每个切片(每个膝关节两个切片)评估三个感兴趣区域 (ROI):外侧股骨髁中央 (cLFC)、外侧股骨髁后部 (pLFC) 和外侧胫骨平台 (LTP)。对于每个 ROI,比较平均 T1 rho 和 T2 弛豫时间、ICRS 分级和 OARSI 评分。T1 rho 和 T2 均不能反映宏观分级。T1 rho 可区分组织学分级 1 和 2。然而,T2 不能。即使在同一等级,pLFC 的 T1 rho 弛豫时间也高于 cLFC。与 T2 映射相比,T1 rho 映射在 OARSI 组织学分级系统上区分 I 级和 II 级软骨退变可能具有优势。