de Bruijn Gert-Jan, Visscher Ilse, Mollen Saar
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015 May-Jun;47(3):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2015.02.001.
To test the effects of descriptive norm and message framing on fruit intake (intentions) in Dutch adults.
Randomized pretest-posttest study using a 2 × 2 design.
Internet-based.
Dutch adults recruited via leaflets and announcements on intranet and Internet and who provided immediate intention (n = 294) and 1-week follow-up intention and fruit intake data (n = 177).
Messages combining information on intake of others (low vs high intake) with information about positive or negative outcomes of (in)sufficient fruit intake.
Fruit intake intentions and fruit intake.
Analyses of covariance.
Those already consuming sufficient fruit and receiving negative information about insufficient fruit intake increased their motivation to consume sufficient fruit immediately (P = .03), but not at 1-week follow-up. Those who read positive information about sufficient fruit intake reported higher fruit consumption than those who read negative information about insufficient fruit intake (P = .03). This was stronger in those already consuming sufficient fruit. There were no effects of descriptive norm information (P > .19).
Information about outcomes was more persuasive than descriptive majority norm information. Effects were generally stronger in those already consuming sufficient fruit.
测试描述性规范和信息框架对荷兰成年人水果摄入量(意愿)的影响。
采用2×2设计的随机前测-后测研究。
基于互联网。
通过在企业内部网和互联网上发放传单及发布公告招募的荷兰成年人,他们提供了即时意愿(n = 294)以及1周随访意愿和水果摄入量数据(n = 177)。
将关于他人摄入量(低摄入量与高摄入量)的信息与水果摄入充足或不足的正面或负面结果的信息相结合的信息。
水果摄入意愿和水果摄入量。
协方差分析。
那些已经摄入足够水果且收到关于水果摄入不足的负面信息的人,会立即增加摄入足够水果的动机(P = 0.03),但在1周随访时没有增加。那些阅读了关于水果摄入充足的正面信息的人报告的水果消费量高于那些阅读了关于水果摄入不足的负面信息的人(P = 0.03)。在那些已经摄入足够水果的人中,这种情况更为明显。描述性规范信息没有产生影响(P > 0.19)。
关于结果的信息比描述性多数规范信息更具说服力。在那些已经摄入足够水果的人中,影响通常更强。