Fischera Wanda, van Beusekom Mara, Higgs Suzanne, Cecil Joanne E
School of Medicine, North Haugh, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, United Kingdom.
School of Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2022 May 17;13:838394. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.838394. eCollection 2022.
This study investigated the influence of descriptive norm messages that either communicated that university students eat a sufficient amount of fruit and vegetable (F&V) or that they do not, on F&V consumption, and whether or not any effects are moderated by student identification. An online 2 (Norm: "Sufficient"/"Insufficient") × 2 (Identification: "Low"/"High") experimental design was employed. Infographics containing "sufficient"/"insufficient" F&V intake descriptive norms were presented. An identification manipulation was employed to create "high"/"low" student identifiers. F&V intake intentions were assessed after the manipulations; self-reported F&V intake was reported at 2 days post-intervention. Undergraduate students in the United Kingdom ( = 180) reported their intake intentions, of which 112 (62%) completed the behavioral follow-up. Participants were predominantly white female students from Scottish universities, mean age 20.4 (±1.6) years. Baseline mean F&V consumption was high (4.5 ± 2.8). There were no significant main effects of Norm or Identification manipulations on F&V intentions and intake. Significant norm × identification interactions were revealed for fruit intake intentions and vegetable intake at follow-up, indicating half-portion differences (~40 g) between groups. Ironic effects were observed for "high" identifiers, who neither intended to, nor acted in accordance with group norms; "low" student identifiers intended to and followed group norms, whereby the "sufficient"/"low" group intended to consume significantly more fruit portions and consumed more vegetables than the "insufficient"/"low" group. Given the half-portion differences between groups resulting from the norm × identification interactions, future research on a larger sample of young adults with low F&V intake is warranted to further explore the conditions under which moderating effects of identification are observed and the underlying mechanisms.
本研究调查了描述性规范信息对水果和蔬菜(F&V)摄入量的影响,这些信息传达的内容要么是大学生摄入了足够量的水果和蔬菜,要么是摄入量不足,同时还研究了学生认同感是否会调节这些影响。采用了在线2(规范:“足够”/“不足”)×2(认同感:“低”/“高”)实验设计。展示了包含“足够”/“不足”F&V摄入量描述性规范的信息图表。采用认同感操纵来创建“高”/“低”学生认同感。在操纵后评估F&V摄入意图;干预后2天报告自我报告的F&V摄入量。英国的本科生(n = 180)报告了他们的摄入意图,其中112人(62%)完成了行为随访。参与者主要是来自苏格兰大学的白人女学生,平均年龄20.4(±1.6)岁。基线时F&V的平均消费量较高(4.5±2.8)。规范或认同感操纵对F&V意图和摄入量没有显著的主效应。在随访时,水果摄入意图和蔬菜摄入显示出显著的规范×认同感交互作用,表明各组之间存在半份差异(约40克)。观察到“高”认同感者存在反讽效应,他们既无意也未按照群体规范行事;“低”学生认同感者有意并遵循群体规范,因此“足够”/“低”组比“不足”/“低”组打算摄入显著更多份的水果且摄入了更多的蔬菜。鉴于规范×认同感交互作用导致的各组之间半份差异,有必要对更大样本的F&V摄入量低的年轻人进行未来研究,以进一步探索观察到认同感调节效应的条件及其潜在机制。