• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

智力残疾者的亲密关系:一项定性研究。

The Close Relationships of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Sullivan Faye, Bowden Keith, McKenzie Karen, Quayle Ethel

机构信息

Clinical Psychology Department, Medical School, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Learning Disability Clinical Psychology Department, NHS Forth Valley, Falkirk Community Hospital, Falkirk, UK.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2016 Mar;29(2):172-84. doi: 10.1111/jar.12168. Epub 2015 May 11.

DOI:10.1111/jar.12168
PMID:25960247
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Positive interpersonal relationships have been found to enhance an individual's quality of life. However, people with intellectual disabilities (PWID) often have restricted social networks, and little is known about their views on close social relationships. The study aimed to explore how this group perceives and experiences close relationships.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten (6 = men 4 = women) PWID participated. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews, and analysed using interpretive phenomenological analysis.

RESULTS

The results report on three of five themes drawn from a larger qualitative study: 'Relationships feeling safe and being useful'; 'Who's in charge?' and 'Struggling for an ordinary life'.

CONCLUSIONS

Close relationships are valued and desired by PWID, but a variety of barriers inhibit their development and maintenance. This includes the failure of others to value, accept and appropriately support the independence and relationships of PWID. Potential ways of addressing these issues are discussed.

摘要

背景

研究发现积极的人际关系能够提升个人生活质量。然而,智障人士的社交网络往往有限,对于他们对亲密社会关系的看法我们知之甚少。本研究旨在探索这一群体如何看待和体验亲密关系。

材料与方法

10名智障人士(6名男性,4名女性)参与了研究。通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并采用解释现象学分析方法进行分析。

结果

研究结果报告了从一项更大规模定性研究中得出的五个主题中的三个:“关系带来安全感且有益处”;“谁做主?”以及“为平凡生活而奋斗”。

结论

亲密关系受到智障人士的重视和渴望,但各种障碍阻碍了这些关系的发展和维系。这包括他人未能重视、接受并适当支持智障人士的独立性和人际关系。文中讨论了解决这些问题的潜在方法。

相似文献

1
The Close Relationships of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Study.智力残疾者的亲密关系:一项定性研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2016 Mar;29(2):172-84. doi: 10.1111/jar.12168. Epub 2015 May 11.
2
'Touching people in relationships': a qualitative study of close relationships for people with an intellectual disability.“人际关系中的人际接触”:一项关于智障人士亲密关系的定性研究
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Dec;22(23-24):3456-66. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12375. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
3
The experiences of intimate relationships by people with intellectual disabilities: a qualitative study.智力障碍者的亲密关系体验:一项质性研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Nov;27(6):531-41. doi: 10.1111/jar.12091. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
4
Friendships and Intimate Relationships among People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Thematic Synthesis.智力障碍者的友谊和亲密关系:主题综合分析。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):e18-e35. doi: 10.1111/jar.12312. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
5
Restrictions, Power, Companionship, and Intimacy: A Metasynthesis of People With Intellectual Disability Speaking About Sex and Relationships.限制、权力、陪伴和亲密关系:智力障碍人士谈论性和关系的元分析。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019 Jun;57(3):212-233. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-57.3.212.
6
The lived experience of people with intellectual disabilities in post-secondary or higher education.智力残疾人士在高等教育或以上阶段的生活体验。
J Intellect Disabil. 2020 Sep;24(3):339-357. doi: 10.1177/1744629518805603. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
7
What's in it for me? The meaning of involvement in a self-advocacy group for six people with intellectual disabilities.这对我有什么好处?六位智障人士参与自我倡导团体的意义。
J Intellect Disabil. 2015 Sep;19(3):230-50. doi: 10.1177/1744629515571646. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
8
Doing Research Together: A Study on the Views of Advisors with Intellectual Disabilities and Non-Disabled Researchers Collaborating in Research.共同开展研究:一项关于智障顾问与非残疾研究人员合作开展研究观点的研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2016 Mar;29(2):146-59. doi: 10.1111/jar.12165. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
9
The process of perceiving stigmatization: perspectives from Taiwanese young people with intellectual disability.感知污名化的过程:来自台湾智障青年的观点。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2012 May;25(3):240-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2011.00661.x. Epub 2012 Jan 2.
10
Inclusive research: making a difference to policy and legislation.包容性研究:对政策和立法产生影响。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):76-84. doi: 10.1111/jar.12085. Epub 2013 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Where Care Converges: Uncovering Shared Experiences of Parents and Service Providers for Adults With Intellectual Disabilities in Times of Austerity.关怀汇聚之处:揭示经济紧缩时期智障成年人的父母与服务提供者的共同经历
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Mar;38(2):e70044. doi: 10.1111/jar.70044.
2
Parents and service providers' perspectives about social inclusion of people with neurodevelopmental disabilities in Qatar: investigation of financial transactions and personal status laws.卡塔尔父母及服务提供者对神经发育障碍者社会融入的看法:金融交易与个人身份法调查
Int J Dev Disabil. 2024 Nov 14;70(6):1112-1122. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2024.2384762. eCollection 2024.
3
Self-Determination Competencies, (Dis)Agreement in Decision-Making, and Personal Well-Being of Adults with Mild Intellectual Disabilities in Hong Kong.
香港轻度智力障碍成年人的自主能力、决策(不)一致与个人幸福感。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10721. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010721.
4
One social network, two perspectives: Social networks of people with Down syndrome based on self-reports and proxy reports.一个社交网络,两种视角:基于自我报告和代理报告的唐氏综合征患者的社交网络。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Nov;33(6):1188-1198. doi: 10.1111/jar.12736. Epub 2020 Apr 14.