• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个社交网络,两种视角:基于自我报告和代理报告的唐氏综合征患者的社交网络。

One social network, two perspectives: Social networks of people with Down syndrome based on self-reports and proxy reports.

机构信息

hsg Bochum Hochschule für Gesundheit, University of Applied Sciences, Bochum, Germany.

Social and Behavioral Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Nov;33(6):1188-1198. doi: 10.1111/jar.12736. Epub 2020 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1111/jar.12736
PMID:32285593
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For people with intellectual disabilities (ID), social networks play a key role in facilitating social inclusion, health, and quality of life. This study shows that a multi-informant approach to collecting social network data improves our understanding of the social worlds of people with Down Syndrome (DS).

METHOD

A mixed methods egocentric network approach was employed to investigate 27 dyads comprised of people with DS and their family members as proxy reporters to examine variability in network characteristics across self- and proxy reports.

RESULTS

The self-reported total network size of people with DS was significantly smaller than the network size based on proxy reports. Significant differences were found between self- and proxy-reported networks with respect to most relationship groups. Proxy informants reported more "paid staff".

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that multiple perspectives on the social networks of people with DS are advantageous for researchers, policy makers, and practitioners.

摘要

背景

对于智障人士(ID)来说,社交网络在促进社会包容、健康和生活质量方面起着关键作用。本研究表明,采用多信息源方法收集社交网络数据,可以更好地了解唐氏综合征(DS)患者的社交世界。

方法

采用混合方法的自我中心网络方法,调查了 27 对由唐氏综合征患者及其家庭成员作为代理报告者组成的个体,以考察自我报告和代理报告的网络特征的变异性。

结果

唐氏综合征患者的自我报告总网络规模明显小于基于代理报告的网络规模。在大多数关系群体中,自我报告和代理报告的网络之间存在显著差异。代理信息提供者报告了更多的“带薪员工”。

结论

我们的研究表明,从多个角度看待唐氏综合征患者的社交网络,对研究人员、政策制定者和实践者都有利。

相似文献

1
One social network, two perspectives: Social networks of people with Down syndrome based on self-reports and proxy reports.一个社交网络,两种视角:基于自我报告和代理报告的唐氏综合征患者的社交网络。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2020 Nov;33(6):1188-1198. doi: 10.1111/jar.12736. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
2
Prosodic skills in Spanish-speaking adolescents and young adults with Down syndrome.西班牙语为母语的唐氏综合征青少年和成年人的韵律技能。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1284-1295. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13001. Epub 2023 Dec 28.
3
Community Member Views on Autism Intervention: Effects of Closeness to Autistic People with Intellectual Disabilities And Nonspeaking Autistic People.社区成员对自闭症干预的看法:与智障自闭症患者及无语言能力自闭症患者亲近程度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):253-271. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0202. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
8
Pharmacological interventions for self-injurious behaviour in adults with intellectual disabilities.针对成年智障人士自伤行为的药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD009084. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009084.pub2.
9
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
10
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of behavioural parent training on attachment security in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised controlled trial.行为父母训练对注意缺陷多动障碍儿童依恋安全性的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Oct 4;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08431-z.
2
Quality of life in adults with Down syndrome: A mixed methods systematic review.唐氏综合征成人的生活质量:一项混合方法系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 May 1;18(5):e0280014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280014. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Building and Connecting: Family Strategies for Developing Social Support Networks for Adults With Down Syndrome.构建与联系:为唐氏综合征成人建立和拓展社会支持网络的家庭策略。
J Fam Nurs. 2019 Feb;25(1):128-151. doi: 10.1177/1074840718823578. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Comparisons of self and proxy report on health-related factors in people with intellectual disability.智力残疾者自我报告与代理报告对健康相关因素的比较。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Sep;31(5):927-936. doi: 10.1111/jar.12452. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
3
Why Social Relationships Are Important for Physical Health: A Systems Approach to Understanding and Modifying Risk and Protection.
为什么社会关系对身体健康很重要:理解和改变风险与保护的系统方法。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:437-458. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011902. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
4
A prospective 20-year longitudinal follow-up of dementia in persons with Down syndrome.唐氏综合征患者痴呆的前瞻性 20 年纵向随访。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2017 Sep;61(9):843-852. doi: 10.1111/jir.12390. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
5
Facilitating employment opportunities for adults with intellectual and developmental disability through parents and social networks.通过父母和社交网络为有智力和发育障碍的成年人提供就业机会。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016 Apr;38(8):789-795. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1061605. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
6
The Close Relationships of People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Qualitative Study.智力残疾者的亲密关系:一项定性研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2016 Mar;29(2):172-84. doi: 10.1111/jar.12168. Epub 2015 May 11.
7
Informal social networks of people with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: relationship with age, communicative abilities and current living arrangements.重度智力残疾和多重残疾者的非正式社交网络:与年龄、沟通能力及当前生活安排的关系
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2015 Mar;28(2):159-64. doi: 10.1111/jar.12115. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
8
Social networks of people with mild intellectual disabilities: characteristics, satisfaction, wishes and quality of life.轻度智力障碍者的社交网络:特征、满意度、愿望及生活质量。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015 May;59(5):450-61. doi: 10.1111/jir.12143. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
9
Sexual understanding, sources of information and social networks; the reports of young people with intellectual disabilities and their non-disabled peers.性知识、信息来源和社交网络;智障青年及其非智障同龄人报告。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2014 May;58(5):430-41. doi: 10.1111/jir.12040. Epub 2013 Apr 19.
10
Structural and functional characteristics of the social networks of people with mild intellectual disabilities.智力轻度残疾者社交网络的结构和功能特征。
Res Dev Disabil. 2013 Apr;34(4):1280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Feb 14.