Lagares Antonio, Agaras Betina, Bettiol Marisa P, Gatti Blanca M, Valverde Claudio
Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Microbiología e Interacciones Biológicas en el Suelo, Departamento de Ciencia y Tecnología, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Roque Sáenz Peña 352, Bernal B1876BXD, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Sala de Microbiología HIAEP "Sor María Ludovica", Calle 14N° 1631, La Plata B1904CSI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Microbiol Methods. 2015 Jul;114:66-74. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 8.
Species-specific genetic markers are crucial to develop faithful and sensitive molecular methods for the detection and identification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa). We have previously set up a PCR-RFLP protocol targeting oprF, the gene encoding the genus-specific outer membrane porin F, whose strong conservation and marked sequence diversity allowed detection and differentiation of environmental isolates (Agaras et al., 2012). Here, we evaluated the ability of the PCR-RFLP assay to genotype clinical isolates previously identified as Pa by conventional microbiological methods within a collection of 62 presumptive Pa isolates from different pediatric clinical samples and different sections of the Hospital de Niños "Sor María Ludovica" from La Plata, Argentina. All isolates, but one, gave an oprF amplicon consistent with that from reference Pa strains. The sequence of the smaller-sized amplicon revealed that the isolate was in fact a mendocina Pseudomonas strain. The oprF RFLP pattern generated with TaqI or HaeIII nucleases matched those of reference Pa strains for 59 isolates (96%). The other two Pa isolates (4%) revealed a different RFLP pattern based on HaeIII digestion, although oprF sequencing confirmed that Pa identification was correct. We next tested the effectiveness of the PCR-RFLP to detect pseudomonads on clinical samples of pediatric fibrocystic patients directly without sample cultivation. The expected amplicon and its cognate RFLP profile were obtained for all samples in which Pa was previously detected by cultivation-dependent methods. Altogether, these results provide the basis for the application of the oprF PCR-RFLP protocol to directly detect and identify Pa and other non-Pa pseudomonads in fibrocystic clinical samples.
物种特异性遗传标记对于开发用于检测和鉴定铜绿假单胞菌(Pa)的可靠且灵敏的分子方法至关重要。我们之前建立了一种针对oprF的PCR-RFLP方案,oprF是编码属特异性外膜孔蛋白F的基因,其高度保守性和显著的序列多样性使得能够检测和区分环境分离株(Agaras等人,2012年)。在此,我们评估了PCR-RFLP检测方法对临床分离株进行基因分型的能力,这些临床分离株先前已通过传统微生物学方法在来自阿根廷拉普拉塔市“索非亚·卢多维卡儿童医院”不同儿科临床样本和不同科室的62株疑似Pa分离株中被鉴定为Pa。除了一株分离株外,所有分离株产生的oprF扩增子与参考Pa菌株的扩增子一致。较小尺寸扩增子的序列显示该分离株实际上是一株门多萨假单胞菌菌株。用TaqI或HaeIII核酸酶产生的oprF RFLP图谱与59株参考Pa菌株(96%)的图谱匹配。另外两株Pa分离株(4%)基于HaeIII消化显示出不同的RFLP图谱,尽管oprF测序证实Pa的鉴定是正确的。接下来,我们测试了PCR-RFLP直接检测儿科纤维囊性患者临床样本中的假单胞菌而无需样本培养的有效性。对于所有先前通过依赖培养方法检测到Pa的样本,均获得了预期的扩增子及其相应的RFLP图谱。总之,这些结果为应用oprF PCR-RFLP方案直接检测和鉴定纤维囊性临床样本中的Pa和其他非Pa假单胞菌提供了依据。