Boeni Fabienne, Arnet Isabelle, Hersberger Kurt E
Pharmaceutical care research group, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2015 Apr 24;9:597-605. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S76027. eCollection 2015.
Numerous studies showed the effectiveness of pharmaceutical care in improving medication adherence in primary care patients. However, in daily pharmacy practice, the provision of pharmaceutical care appears to be limited. We aimed at quantifying the content of counseling by community pharmacy staff during patient contacts, especially adherence counseling, and at investigating pharmacist views about their practice of adherence counseling.
A Master's student in Pharmacy observed patient contacts at selected community pharmacies in the region of Basel, Switzerland. Content of counseling was manually ticked on a checklist with predefined themes (administration, dose, effect, and adherence). Pharmacists working in the pharmacy were interviewed on triggers, topics, and barriers in adherence counseling.
In 20 community pharmacies and during a total of 148.1 hours, 1,866 patient contacts were observed. During the 1,476 patient contacts including the dispensing of one or more medications, counseling was provided to 799 (54.1%) patients; with 735 (49.8%) patients counseled about administration, 362 (24.5%) about dose, 267 (18.1%) about effect, and 99 (6.7%) about adherence. Significantly more patients received counseling when they obtained prescribed versus over-the-counter medication (P=0.002), a new prescription versus a repeat prescription (P<0.001), or when they were served by a pharmacist versus by another staff member (P<0.001). Of the 33 interviewed pharmacists, all except one reported actively approaching patients for adherence counseling. Triggers included medication-related and patient-related factors. The pharmacists named predominantly product-centered topics of adherence counseling. The most cited barriers were rejection of counseling by the patient and lack of time.
Half of the patients receiving one or more medications were counseled, and only 6.7% of all contacts included adherence counseling. Future studies should clarify how barriers to adherence counseling at the community pharmacy can be overcome.
大量研究表明药学服务在提高基层医疗患者用药依从性方面具有有效性。然而,在日常药房实践中,药学服务的提供似乎有限。我们旨在量化社区药房工作人员在与患者接触期间的咨询内容,尤其是依从性咨询,并调查药剂师对其依从性咨询实践的看法。
一名药学专业硕士研究生在瑞士巴塞尔地区选定的社区药房观察与患者的接触情况。咨询内容通过在具有预定义主题(给药、剂量、效果和依从性)的检查表上手动勾选来记录。对在药房工作的药剂师就依从性咨询的触发因素、主题和障碍进行了访谈。
在20家社区药房,共观察了148.1小时,期间有1866次与患者的接触。在包括调配一种或多种药物的1476次患者接触中,有799名(54.1%)患者接受了咨询;其中735名(49.8%)患者接受了关于给药的咨询,362名(24.5%)关于剂量,267名(18.1%)关于效果,99名(6.7%)关于依从性。当患者获得处方药而非非处方药时(P = 0.002)、获得新处方而非重复处方时(P < 0.001),或者由药剂师而非其他工作人员服务时(P < 0.001),接受咨询的患者明显更多。在接受访谈的33名药剂师中,除一人外,其他所有人都报告积极主动地对患者进行依从性咨询。触发因素包括与药物相关和与患者相关的因素。药剂师提到的依从性咨询主题主要以产品为中心。最常提到的障碍是患者拒绝咨询和时间不足。
接受一种或多种药物治疗的患者中有一半接受了咨询,而在所有接触中只有6.7%包括依从性咨询。未来的研究应阐明如何克服社区药房依从性咨询的障碍。