Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trust, St Nicholas Hospital, Gosforth, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE3 3XT UK.
Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Ridley Building, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU UK.
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2014 Mar 11;2:2. doi: 10.1186/2194-7511-2-2. eCollection 2014.
Because impulsivity is part of the presentation of bipolar disorder (BD) and is associated with its course, this systematic review presents the evidence whether increased impulsivity is present in a stable, euthymic mood and therefore potentially a vulnerability marker for BD. A multi-faceted model of impulsivity was adopted to explore how different facets may relate differently to BD. The evidence was explored in relation to studies employing measures of trait impulsivity (in self-report format) and studies exploring impulsivity with behavioural paradigms. Behavioural paradigms were separated into studies measuring response inhibition and those measuring the ability to delay gratification. Twenty-three papers met the inclusion criteria. Most studies using self-report measures found significant differences between euthymic BD patients and healthy controls. There was little evidence of increased impulsivity as measured by behavioural paradigms. Most studies found no significant difference in response inhibition between groups, though it is possible that much of the literature in this area was underpowered to detect an effect. Only five studies explored delay of gratification, of which the two methodologically strongest studies found no group differences. In conclusion, there is evidence that euthymic patients with BD report increased impulsivity when using self-ratings. However, there is currently limited evidence of impulsivity on behavioural measures assessing response inhibition, and this might be restricted to more severe cases. More research is needed on the ability to delay gratification before drawing any conclusions. However, to establish facets of impulsivity as vulnerability markers, future studies should include at-risk individuals to evaluate whether self-rated or behavioural impulsivity precedes the onset of BD.
由于冲动是双相情感障碍(BD)表现的一部分,并且与疾病的病程有关,因此本系统综述提出了在稳定的、情绪良好的情况下是否存在冲动增加的证据,这可能是 BD 的一个脆弱性标志物。本研究采用了一个多方面的冲动模型来探索不同方面可能与 BD 有何不同的关系。研究人员根据使用特质冲动量表(自我报告形式)的研究和使用行为范式探索冲动的研究来探讨证据。行为范式分为测量反应抑制的研究和测量延迟满足能力的研究。有 23 篇论文符合纳入标准。大多数使用自我报告测量的研究发现,情绪良好的 BD 患者与健康对照组之间存在显著差异。行为范式测量的冲动增加证据很少。大多数研究发现,两组之间的反应抑制没有显著差异,但该领域的许多文献可能由于效力不足而无法检测到效果。只有 5 项研究探索了延迟满足,其中两项方法学最强的研究发现组间没有差异。总之,有证据表明,使用自我评估时,BD 情绪良好的患者报告的冲动增加。然而,目前关于评估反应抑制的行为测量的冲动的证据有限,而且这种情况可能仅限于更严重的病例。在得出任何结论之前,还需要更多关于延迟满足能力的研究。然而,为了将冲动的各个方面确立为脆弱性标志物,未来的研究应该包括处于风险中的个体,以评估自我评估或行为冲动是否先于 BD 的发作。