Hirahara Noriyuki, Matsubara Takeshi, Hayashi Hikota, Takai Kiyoe, Fujii Yusuke, Tajima Yoshitsugu
Department of Digestive and General Surgery, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, 89-1 Enya-cho, Izumo, Shimane, 693-8501, Japan.
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 May 12;13:181. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0591-9.
Unnecessary intra-abdominal drain insertion must be avoided, but little is known about the value of prophylactic drainage following laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). In this study, we investigated the significance of prophylactic drain placement after LDG for gastric cancer.
Seventy-eight consecutive patients with gastric cancer who underwent LDG in our department were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the insertion of a prophylactic intra-abdominal drain following LDG. The 'drain group' comprised 45 patients with routine use of a prophylactic intra-abdominal drain, and the 'no-drain group' comprised 33 patients who did not undergo placement of an intra-abdominal drain.
There were no significant differences in terms of the mean age of the patients, male/female ratio, body mass index, and concurrent diseases between the drain group and the no-drain group. In addition, there were no significant differences in the tumor location, tumor diameter, depth of the tumor, nodal metastasis, and tumor stage between the two groups. All patients in each group were successfully treated with R0 surgery, and no patient required conversion to open surgery. Surgery-related factors, including lymph node dissection and operative time, were similar in the drain group and the no-drain group. A comparison of the amount of intraoperative blood loss between patients with and without postoperative complications revealed that patients who experienced postoperative complications had a significantly larger amount of blood loss than those without postoperative complications. A comparison of operative times between patients with and without surgery-related postoperative local complications revealed that patients who experienced surgery-related postoperative local complications had a significantly longer operative time than those without surgery-related postoperative local complications. Analysis of operative times in each group revealed that patients with surgery-related postoperative local complications had a significantly longer operative time than those without surgery-related postoperative local complications in the no-drain group.
Intraoperative factors such as the operative time and the amount of intraoperative blood loss affected the occurrence of postoperative complications following LDG. A prophylactic drain may thus be useful in patients at higher risk and in those with a longer operative time or massive intraoperative bleeding.
必须避免不必要的腹腔内引流管置入,但对于腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术(LDG)后预防性引流的价值知之甚少。在本研究中,我们调查了LDG术后预防性放置引流管对胃癌的意义。
回顾性分析了在我科连续接受LDG的78例胃癌患者。根据LDG术后是否置入预防性腹腔引流管将患者分为两组。“引流组”包括45例常规使用预防性腹腔引流管的患者,“无引流组”包括33例未进行腹腔引流管置入的患者。
引流组和无引流组患者的平均年龄、男女比例、体重指数和合并疾病方面无显著差异。此外,两组在肿瘤位置、肿瘤直径、肿瘤深度、淋巴结转移和肿瘤分期方面也无显著差异。每组所有患者均成功接受R0手术,无一例患者需要转为开放手术。引流组和无引流组的手术相关因素,包括淋巴结清扫和手术时间相似。有术后并发症和无术后并发症患者术中失血量的比较显示,发生术后并发症的患者失血量明显多于无术后并发症的患者。有手术相关术后局部并发症和无手术相关术后局部并发症患者手术时间的比较显示,发生手术相关术后局部并发症的患者手术时间明显长于无手术相关术后局部并发症的患者。对每组手术时间的分析显示,无引流组中有手术相关术后局部并发症的患者手术时间明显长于无手术相关术后局部并发症的患者。
手术时间和术中失血量等术中因素影响LDG术后并发症的发生。因此,预防性引流可能对高危患者以及手术时间较长或术中大量出血的患者有用。