• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术D1+与D2淋巴结清扫的短期疗效。

Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.

作者信息

Goto Hironobu, Yasuda Takashi, Oshikiri Taro, Kanaji Shingo, Kawasaki Kentaro, Imanishi Tatsuya, Oyama Masato, Kakinoki Keitaro, Ohara Tadayuki, Sendo Hiroyoshi, Fujino Yasuhiro, Tominaga Masahiro, Kakeji Yoshihiro

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo Cancer Center, Akashi, Japan.

Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 May;9(2):116-21. doi: 10.1111/ases.12269. Epub 2016 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1111/ases.12269
PMID:26804340
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with D1+ lymph node dissection (LND) for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted. However, LDG with D2 LND for advanced gastric cancer remains in limited use. The aim of this retrospective study was to clarify the safety of LDG with D2 LND for gastric cancer.

METHODS

From January 2010 to September 2014, 296 patients underwent LDG; those who received D1+ LND (n = 230) or D2 LND (n = 66) were included in this study. The clinicopathological characteristics and short-term outcomes of both groups were investigated and compared.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups. However, the frequency of infectious intra-abdominal complications was higher in the D2 LND group than in the D1+ LND group. Additionally, a lower risk of infectious intra-abdominal complications was seen with certified than with uncertified operators.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of short-term outcomes demonstrated that LDG with D2 LND is generally feasible. However, the risk of infectious intra-abdominal complications is higher with D2 LND than with D1+ LND. Also, D2 LND should be performed by trained operators.

摘要

引言

腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术(LDG)联合D1+淋巴结清扫术(LND)治疗早期胃癌已被广泛接受。然而,LDG联合D2淋巴结清扫术治疗进展期胃癌的应用仍然有限。本回顾性研究的目的是阐明LDG联合D2淋巴结清扫术治疗胃癌的安全性。

方法

2010年1月至2014年9月,296例患者接受了LDG;本研究纳入了接受D1+淋巴结清扫术(n = 230)或D2淋巴结清扫术(n = 66)的患者。对两组患者的临床病理特征和短期结局进行了调查和比较。

结果

两组术后并发症发生率无显著差异。然而,D2淋巴结清扫术组腹腔内感染性并发症的发生率高于D1+淋巴结清扫术组。此外,与未经认证的术者相比,经认证的术者发生腹腔内感染性并发症的风险更低。

结论

短期结局评估表明,LDG联合D2淋巴结清扫术总体上是可行的。然而,D2淋巴结清扫术发生腹腔内感染性并发症的风险高于D1+淋巴结清扫术。此外,D2淋巴结清扫术应由经过培训的术者进行。

相似文献

1
Comparing the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.比较腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术D1+与D2淋巴结清扫的短期疗效。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2016 May;9(2):116-21. doi: 10.1111/ases.12269. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
2
Comparative analysis of station-specific lymph node yield in laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜与开放远端胃切除术中特定部位淋巴结清扫数量的比较分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Dec;21(6):424-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182367dee.
3
Comparison of long term survival outcomes between D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for ≥ pT2 or pN+ gastric carcinoma: A large scale case-control study using propensity score matching.比较 D1+ 和 D2 淋巴结清扫术对≥pT2 或 pN+ 胃癌患者长期生存结局的影响:一项使用倾向评分匹配的大型病例对照研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul;46(7):1239-1246. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.013. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
4
A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open extended (D2) lymph node dissection for distal gastric carcinoma.腹腔镜与开腹扩大(D2)淋巴结清扫术治疗远端胃癌的倾向评分匹配病例对照比较研究。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2792-800. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2809-7. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
5
Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT).腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的多中心随机对照研究(KLASS-02-RCT)的短期疗效观察。
Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):983-991. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003217.
6
Comparison of long-term prognosis of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and conventional open gastrectomy with special reference to D2 lymph node dissection.腹腔镜辅助胃癌根治术与传统开腹胃癌根治术的长期预后比较,尤其在 D2 淋巴结清扫方面。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Aug;26(8):2240-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2167-x. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
7
Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜辅助下与传统开放远端胃切除术及胃周外淋巴结清扫术的比较
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;91(1):90-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.20271.
8
Lymph Node Dissection Using Bipolar Vessel-Sealing Device During Reduced Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Result of a Pilot Study from a Single Institute.使用双极血管闭合装置在减少端口腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术中进行淋巴结清扫:单机构初步研究结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Nov;27(11):1101-1108. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0685. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
9
Comparison of short-term surgical outcomes between laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma: case-control study using propensity score matching method.腹腔镜与开腹全胃切除术治疗胃癌的短期手术效果比较:倾向评分匹配法的病例对照研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Feb;216(2):184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.10.014. Epub 2012 Dec 2.
10
A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901).一项多机构前瞻性II期可行性研究:腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌D2淋巴结清扫术治疗局部进展期胃癌(JLSSG0901)
World J Surg. 2015 Nov;39(11):2734-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of pancreas compression time during minimally invasive gastrectomy on the postoperative complications in gastric cancer.微创胃切除术期间胰腺压迫时间对胃癌术后并发症的影响。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021 Jul 14;5(6):785-793. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12488. eCollection 2021 Nov.