• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的肿瘤学充分性,特别关注淋巴结清扫:与传统开放胃癌根治术的比较

Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection: a comparison with conventional open gastrectomy.

作者信息

Ikeda Osamu, Sakaguchi Yoshihisa, Toh Yasushi, Oogaki Kippei, Oki Eiji, Minami Kazuhito, Okamura Takeshi, Baba Hideo

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Mar-Apr;59(114):627-32. doi: 10.5754/hge10089.

DOI:10.5754/hge10089
PMID:22353532
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) with lymphadenectomy has been revealed to be a useful treatment for early gastric cancer but oncological adequacy is controversial.

METHODOLOGY

To assess the quality of lymphadenectomy, we evaluated the number of dissected lymph nodes and the non-compliance rate (defined as an absence of nodal tissue at a node station that should have been resected) and compared the data obtained from 102 patients treated by LDG with those from 90 patients treated by open distal gastrectomy (ODG).

RESULTS

The numbers of nodes of Categories 1 and 2, which correspond respectively to perigastric and retroperitoneal nodes, did not differ significantly between the LDG group and the ODG group. In the LDG group compared to the ODG group, there were significantly more right paracardial nodes (No. 1) but there were significantly fewer infrapyloric nodes (No. 6). However, the difference in infrapyloric nodes (No. 6) became insignificant when we re-analyzed and compared the ODG group and the patients (n=42) whose LDGs were performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

CONCLUSIONS

The curability of gastric cancer on LDG was almost equivalent to that of ODG from the viewpoint of lymph node dissection, if the LDG is performed by two experienced laparoscopic surgeons. These data suggested that LDG with lymphadenectomy could possibly be adopted for advanced gastric cancer treatment under proper quality control, such as that provided by an experienced laparoscopic team.

摘要

背景/目的:腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)联合淋巴结清扫术已被证明是早期胃癌的一种有效治疗方法,但肿瘤学的充分性存在争议。

方法

为评估淋巴结清扫的质量,我们评估了清扫淋巴结的数量和不符合率(定义为在应切除的淋巴结站无淋巴结组织),并将102例行LDG治疗的患者的数据与90例行开放远端胃切除术(ODG)治疗的患者的数据进行比较。

结果

LDG组和ODG组中分别对应胃周和腹膜后淋巴结的第1和第2类淋巴结数量无显著差异。与ODG组相比,LDG组的心旁右侧淋巴结(第1组)明显更多,但幽门下淋巴结(第6组)明显更少。然而,当我们重新分析并比较ODG组和由两位经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行LDG手术的患者(n = 42)时,幽门下淋巴结(第6组)的差异变得不显著。

结论

从淋巴结清扫的角度来看,如果由两位经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生进行LDG手术,胃癌的治愈率几乎与ODG相当。这些数据表明,在适当的质量控制下,如由经验丰富的腹腔镜团队提供的质量控制,LDG联合淋巴结清扫术可能适用于进展期胃癌的治疗。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection: a comparison with conventional open gastrectomy.评估腹腔镜远端胃癌根治术的肿瘤学充分性,特别关注淋巴结清扫:与传统开放胃癌根治术的比较
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Mar-Apr;59(114):627-32. doi: 10.5754/hge10089.
2
Comparative analysis of station-specific lymph node yield in laparoscopic and open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜与开放远端胃切除术中特定部位淋巴结清扫数量的比较分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Dec;21(6):424-8. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3182367dee.
3
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection: a critical reappraisal from the viewpoint of lymph node retrieval.腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术联合系统性淋巴结清扫:从淋巴结清扫角度的批判性重新评估
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Jun;198(6):933-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.01.021.
4
Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted by conventional open distal gastrectomy and extraperigastric lymph node dissection in early gastric cancer.早期胃癌腹腔镜辅助下与传统开放远端胃切除术及胃周外淋巴结清扫术的比较
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;91(1):90-4. doi: 10.1002/jso.20271.
5
[Advantage of perisplenic hilar lymph node dissection by laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (D2) over conventional open total gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer].[腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术(D2)行脾门周围淋巴结清扫术相较于传统开放性全胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的优势]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2011 Nov;33(11):864-7.
6
Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.腹腔镜与开腹远端胃癌根治术的疗效比较:随机对照试验和高质量非随机研究的荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2012 Mar;255(3):446-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824682f4.
7
Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT).腹腔镜与开腹胃癌根治术治疗局部进展期胃癌的多中心随机对照研究(KLASS-02-RCT)的短期疗效观察。
Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):983-991. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003217.
8
Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer in middle-low-volume centers in Western countries: a propensity score matching analysis.西方国家中低容量中心局部进展期胃癌行腹腔镜与开腹远端胃切除术的对比:倾向评分匹配分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Sep;405(6):797-807. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01951-7. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
9
A phase-II clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer patients.一项针对胃癌患者的腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术联合D2淋巴结清扫术的II期临床试验。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Nov;14(11):3148-53. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9446-0. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
10
Totally laparoscopic radical BII gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery.全腹腔镜下根治性BII式胃切除术治疗胃癌:与开放手术的比较
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Aug;18(4):369-74. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31816fdd44.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic versus open approach in gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗进展期胃癌的疗效比较:系统评价。
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jun 13;18(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01888-7.
2
A pilot study of lymph node mapping with indocyanine green in robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.吲哚菁绿在机器人胃癌根治术中进行淋巴结定位的一项初步研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2017 Aug 21;5:2050312117727444. doi: 10.1177/2050312117727444. eCollection 2017.
3
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Current considerations.
腹腔镜及机器人辅助胃癌切除术:当前考量因素
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jul 7;22(25):5694-717. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i25.5694.
4
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放胃切除术治疗进展期胃癌的比较:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jul;19(3):939-50. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0516-x. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
5
Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score-based case-matched analysis from a single institution.腹腔镜肝切除联合淋巴结清扫治疗肝内胆管癌的安全性和可行性:来自单一机构的倾向评分匹配病例分析
Surg Endosc. 2016 May;30(5):1999-2010. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4430-4. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
6
Quality of D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: is laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy as effective as open distal gastrectomy?进展期胃癌D2淋巴结清扫的质量:腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌切除术与开放远端胃癌切除术的效果是否相同?
Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1537-44. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3838-6. Epub 2014 Oct 8.