Ishihara Hideaki, Ishihara Shoichiro, Niimi Jun, Neki Hiroaki, Kakehi Yoshiaki, Uemiya Nahoko, Kohyama Shinya, Yamane Fumitaka
Department of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Stroke Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Japan
Department of Endovascular Neurosurgery, Stroke Center, International Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Japan.
Interv Neuroradiol. 2015 Apr;21(2):178-83. doi: 10.1177/1591019915582375. Epub 2015 May 11.
Advances in vascular reconstruction devices and coil technologies have made coil embolization a popular and effective strategy for treatment of relatively wide-neck cerebral aneurysms. However, coil protrusion occurs occasionally, and little is known about the frequency, the risk factors and the risk of thrombo-embolic complications.
We assessed the frequency and the risk factors for coil protrusion in 330 unruptured aneurysm embolization cases, and examined the occurrence of cerebral infarction by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI).
Forty-four instances of coil protrusion were encountered during coil embolization (13.3% of cases), but incidence was reduced to 33 (10% of cases) by balloon press or insertion of the next coil. Coil protrusion occurred more frequently during the last phase of the procedure, and both a wide neck (large fundus to neck ratio) (OR = 1.84, P = 0.03) and an inadequately stable neck frame (OR = 5.49, P = 0.0007) increased protrusion risk. Coil protrusions did not increase the incidence of high-intensity lesions (infarcts) on DW-MRI (33.3% vs 29% of cases with no coil protrusion). However, longer operation time did increase infarct risk (P = 0.0003). Thus, tail or loop type coil protrusion did not increase the risk of thrombo-embolic complications, if adequate blood flow was maintained.
Coil protrusion tended to occur more frequently in cases of wide-neck aneurysms with loose neck framing. Moderate and less coil protrusion carries no additional thrombo-embolic risk, if blood flow is maintained, which can be aided by additional post-operative antiplatelet therapy.
血管重建装置和弹簧圈技术的进步使弹簧圈栓塞术成为治疗相对宽颈脑动脉瘤的常用且有效的策略。然而,弹簧圈偶尔会发生突出,关于其发生率、危险因素及血栓栓塞并发症风险的了解却很少。
我们评估了330例未破裂动脉瘤栓塞病例中弹簧圈突出的发生率及危险因素,并通过弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)检查脑梗死的发生情况。
在弹簧圈栓塞过程中出现了44例弹簧圈突出(占病例的13.3%),但通过球囊压迫或置入下一个弹簧圈后,发生率降至33例(占病例的10%)。弹簧圈突出在手术后期更频繁发生,宽颈(大的瘤底与瘤颈比例)(OR = 1.84,P = 0.03)和瘤颈框架不稳定(OR = 5.49,P = 0.0007)均增加突出风险。弹簧圈突出并未增加DW-MRI上高强度病变(梗死)的发生率(有弹簧圈突出的病例为33.3%,无弹簧圈突出的病例为29%)。然而,手术时间延长确实增加了梗死风险(P = 0.0003)。因此,如果保持足够的血流,尾部或环状弹簧圈突出不会增加血栓栓塞并发症的风险。
宽颈且瘤颈框架松弛的动脉瘤病例中,弹簧圈突出往往更频繁发生。如果保持血流,适度及较少的弹簧圈突出不会带来额外的血栓栓塞风险,术后额外的抗血小板治疗有助于维持血流。