• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在可变电价制度下优化井田运行

Optimizing Wellfield Operation in a Variable Power Price Regime.

作者信息

Bauer-Gottwein Peter, Schneider Raphael, Davidsen Claus

机构信息

Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

Ground Water. 2016 Jan;54(1):92-103. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12341. Epub 2015 May 12.

DOI:10.1111/gwat.12341
PMID:25964991
Abstract

Wellfield management is a multiobjective optimization problem. One important objective has been energy efficiency in terms of minimizing the energy footprint (EFP) of delivered water (MWh/m(3) ). However, power systems in most countries are moving in the direction of deregulated markets and price variability is increasing in many markets because of increased penetration of intermittent renewable power sources. In this context the relevant management objective becomes minimizing the cost of electric energy used for pumping and distribution of groundwater from wells rather than minimizing energy use itself. We estimated EFP of pumped water as a function of wellfield pumping rate (EFP-Q relationship) for a wellfield in Denmark using a coupled well and pipe network model. This EFP-Q relationship was subsequently used in a Stochastic Dynamic Programming (SDP) framework to minimize total cost of operating the combined wellfield-storage-demand system over the course of a 2-year planning period based on a time series of observed price on the Danish power market and a deterministic, time-varying hourly water demand. In the SDP setup, hourly pumping rates are the decision variables. Constraints include storage capacity and hourly water demand fulfilment. The SDP was solved for a baseline situation and for five scenario runs representing different EFP-Q relationships and different maximum wellfield pumping rates. Savings were quantified as differences in total cost between the scenario and a constant-rate pumping benchmark. Minor savings up to 10% were found in the baseline scenario, while the scenario with constant EFP and unlimited pumping rate resulted in savings up to 40%. Key factors determining potential cost savings obtained by flexible wellfield operation under a variable power price regime are the shape of the EFP-Q relationship, the maximum feasible pumping rate and the capacity of available storage facilities.

摘要

井田管理是一个多目标优化问题。一个重要目标是在最小化供水能源足迹(EFP,单位:兆瓦时/立方米)方面实现能源效率。然而,大多数国家的电力系统正朝着放松管制的市场方向发展,由于间歇性可再生能源的渗透率增加,许多市场的价格波动性正在上升。在这种背景下,相关的管理目标变成了最小化用于从井中抽水和分配地下水的电能成本,而不是最小化能源使用本身。我们使用耦合的井和管网模型,估算了丹麦一个井田抽水的EFP与井田抽水速率的函数关系(EFP-Q关系)。随后,基于丹麦电力市场的观测价格时间序列和确定性的、随时间变化的每小时需水量,将这种EFP-Q关系用于随机动态规划(SDP)框架中,以在两年规划期内最小化联合井田-存储-需求系统的运营总成本。在SDP设置中,每小时的抽水速率是决策变量。约束条件包括存储容量和每小时需水量的满足情况。针对基准情况以及代表不同EFP-Q关系和不同最大井田抽水速率的五个情景运行求解了SDP。节省量被量化为情景与恒定速率抽水基准之间总成本的差异。在基准情景中发现了高达10%的少量节省,而EFP恒定且抽水速率无限制的情景则带来了高达40%的节省。在可变电价制度下,通过灵活的井田运营获得潜在成本节省的关键决定因素是EFP-Q关系的形状、最大可行抽水速率和可用存储设施的容量。

相似文献

1
Optimizing Wellfield Operation in a Variable Power Price Regime.在可变电价制度下优化井田运行
Ground Water. 2016 Jan;54(1):92-103. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12341. Epub 2015 May 12.
2
Sinkholes Due to Groundwater Withdrawal in Tazerbo Wellfield, SE Libya.利比亚东南部塔泽尔博井田因地下水抽取导致的沉洞
Ground Water. 2017 Jul;55(4):593-601. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12534. Epub 2017 May 12.
3
Stochastic analyses to identify wellfield withdrawal effects on surface-water and groundwater in Miami-Dade County, Florida.运用随机分析方法识别佛罗里达州迈阿密-戴德县水井开采对地表水和地下水的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 30;113:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.033. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
4
A Hybridized GA with LP-LP Model for the Management of Confined Groundwater.一种用于承压地下水管理的结合线性规划-线性规划模型的混合遗传算法
Ground Water. 2015 May-Jun;53(3):485-92. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12234. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
5
Multiobjective analysis of a public wellfield using artificial neural networks.使用人工神经网络对公共井场进行多目标分析。
Ground Water. 2007 Jan-Feb;45(1):53-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00248.x.
6
Groundwater well optimization to minimize contaminant movement from a surficial shallow aquifer to a lower water supply aquifer using stochastic simulation-optimization modeling techniques: Strategy formulation.利用随机模拟-优化建模技术进行地下水井优化,以尽量减少污染物从表层浅层含水层向较低层供水含水层的移动:策略制定。
MethodsX. 2022 Jun 19;9:101765. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101765. eCollection 2022.
7
Modeling the Factors Impacting Pesticide Concentrations in Groundwater Wells.模拟影响地下水井中农药浓度的因素。
Ground Water. 2015 Sep-Oct;53(5):722-36. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12264. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
8
Hybrid-optimization algorithm for the management of a conjunctive-use project and well field design.联合利用项目和井场设计的混合优化算法。
Ground Water. 2012 Jan-Feb;50(1):103-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00828.x. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
9
Pulsed pumping process optimization using a potential flow model.使用势流模型优化脉冲泵送过程
J Contam Hydrol. 2007 Aug 15;93(1-4):111-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.01.016. Epub 2007 Feb 6.
10
Controlling groundwater pumping online.在线控制地下水抽取。
J Environ Manage. 2009 Aug;90(11):3581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.019. Epub 2009 Aug 11.