Bauer-Gottwein Peter, Schneider Raphael, Davidsen Claus
Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.
Ground Water. 2016 Jan;54(1):92-103. doi: 10.1111/gwat.12341. Epub 2015 May 12.
Wellfield management is a multiobjective optimization problem. One important objective has been energy efficiency in terms of minimizing the energy footprint (EFP) of delivered water (MWh/m(3) ). However, power systems in most countries are moving in the direction of deregulated markets and price variability is increasing in many markets because of increased penetration of intermittent renewable power sources. In this context the relevant management objective becomes minimizing the cost of electric energy used for pumping and distribution of groundwater from wells rather than minimizing energy use itself. We estimated EFP of pumped water as a function of wellfield pumping rate (EFP-Q relationship) for a wellfield in Denmark using a coupled well and pipe network model. This EFP-Q relationship was subsequently used in a Stochastic Dynamic Programming (SDP) framework to minimize total cost of operating the combined wellfield-storage-demand system over the course of a 2-year planning period based on a time series of observed price on the Danish power market and a deterministic, time-varying hourly water demand. In the SDP setup, hourly pumping rates are the decision variables. Constraints include storage capacity and hourly water demand fulfilment. The SDP was solved for a baseline situation and for five scenario runs representing different EFP-Q relationships and different maximum wellfield pumping rates. Savings were quantified as differences in total cost between the scenario and a constant-rate pumping benchmark. Minor savings up to 10% were found in the baseline scenario, while the scenario with constant EFP and unlimited pumping rate resulted in savings up to 40%. Key factors determining potential cost savings obtained by flexible wellfield operation under a variable power price regime are the shape of the EFP-Q relationship, the maximum feasible pumping rate and the capacity of available storage facilities.
井田管理是一个多目标优化问题。一个重要目标是在最小化供水能源足迹(EFP,单位:兆瓦时/立方米)方面实现能源效率。然而,大多数国家的电力系统正朝着放松管制的市场方向发展,由于间歇性可再生能源的渗透率增加,许多市场的价格波动性正在上升。在这种背景下,相关的管理目标变成了最小化用于从井中抽水和分配地下水的电能成本,而不是最小化能源使用本身。我们使用耦合的井和管网模型,估算了丹麦一个井田抽水的EFP与井田抽水速率的函数关系(EFP-Q关系)。随后,基于丹麦电力市场的观测价格时间序列和确定性的、随时间变化的每小时需水量,将这种EFP-Q关系用于随机动态规划(SDP)框架中,以在两年规划期内最小化联合井田-存储-需求系统的运营总成本。在SDP设置中,每小时的抽水速率是决策变量。约束条件包括存储容量和每小时需水量的满足情况。针对基准情况以及代表不同EFP-Q关系和不同最大井田抽水速率的五个情景运行求解了SDP。节省量被量化为情景与恒定速率抽水基准之间总成本的差异。在基准情景中发现了高达10%的少量节省,而EFP恒定且抽水速率无限制的情景则带来了高达40%的节省。在可变电价制度下,通过灵活的井田运营获得潜在成本节省的关键决定因素是EFP-Q关系的形状、最大可行抽水速率和可用存储设施的容量。