Pallister P D, Hecht F, Herrman J
Genetics Center of Southwest Biomedical Research Institute, Tempe, Arizona.
Am J Med Genet. 1989 Aug;33(4):500-1. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320330417.
The cause of this syndrome remains unknown. Epidemiologic studies should be done by experts. The first two cases above gave a "muddy" history for possible teratogens--a "recall bias"--one of a vaginal foam spermicide, one of exposure over several days to a heavy residue of aviation diesel fuel exhaust. We do not think these are pertinent but they do point to the problem of getting a meaningful history. In addressing this problem (in a letter of 5/27/82) R.J. Berry, M.D., medical epidemiologist, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia, wrote "... a designed study providing standardized interview forms with controls could be designed if cases continue to appear." Since this seems to be the case, perhaps this approach should be embraced. A teratogen(s) appears to be a good bet since the condition was recognized suddenly with the first Montana case in February, 1978. Even though no record has been found in the files of the Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, Children's Hospital Automated Medical Programs (CHAMP), Montreal or Wisconsin and one or two other places, it might be worthwhile to look back at all cases of imperforate anus which have come to autopsy for possible associated CNS lesions. We may be deluding ourselves in considering the condition as "new." Chromosomes were usually studied in lymphocytes, once on the tumor and once or twice on marrow. It might be well to do more than one tissue in all new cases. Once again there appears to be no "obligatory" finding for any one syndrome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
该综合征的病因尚不清楚。流行病学研究应由专家进行。上述前两例给出了关于可能致畸物的“模糊”病史——一种“回忆偏倚”——一例是阴道泡沫杀精剂,另一例是数天暴露于航空柴油燃料废气的重残留中。我们认为这些并不相关,但它们确实指出了获取有意义病史的问题。在解决这个问题时(在1982年5月27日的一封信中),佐治亚州亚特兰大疾病控制中心的医学流行病学家R.J. 贝里医学博士写道:“……如果病例继续出现,可以设计一项提供标准化访谈表格并设对照的专门研究。”既然情况似乎如此,也许应该采用这种方法。致畸物似乎很有可能是病因,因为这种病症在1978年2月蒙大拿州的首例病例中突然被发现。尽管在武装部队病理研究所、蒙特利尔儿童医院自动医疗程序(CHAMP)、威斯康星州以及其他一两个地方的档案中未找到记录,但回顾所有已进行尸检的肛门闭锁病例以寻找可能相关的中枢神经系统病变可能是值得的。我们把这种病症视为“新病症”可能是在自欺欺人。染色体研究通常在淋巴细胞中进行,一次在肿瘤上,一两次在骨髓上。在所有新病例中对不止一种组织进行研究可能是妥当的。再一次,似乎没有任何一种综合征有“必然”的发现。(摘要截短至250字)