Moens Katrien, Siegert Richard J, Taylor Steve, Namisango Eve, Harding Richard
King's College London, Cicely Saunders Institute, Department of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, London, United Kingdom.
Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2015 May 12;10(5):e0126554. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126554. eCollection 2015.
Symptom research across conditions has historically focused on single symptoms, and the burden of multiple symptoms and their interactions has been relatively neglected especially in people living with HIV. Symptom cluster studies are required to set priorities in treatment planning, and to lessen the total symptom burden. This study aimed to identify and compare symptom clusters among people living with HIV attending five palliative care facilities in two sub-Saharan African countries.
Data from cross-sectional self-report of seven-day symptom prevalence on the 32-item Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale-Short Form were used. A hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted using Ward's method applying squared Euclidean Distance as the similarity measure to determine the clusters. Contingency tables, X2 tests and ANOVA were used to compare the clusters by patient specific characteristics and distress scores.
Among the sample (N=217) the mean age was 36.5 (SD 9.0), 73.2% were female, and 49.1% were on antiretroviral therapy (ART). The cluster analysis produced five symptom clusters identified as: 1) dermatological; 2) generalised anxiety and elimination; 3) social and image; 4) persistently present; and 5) a gastrointestinal-related symptom cluster. The patients in the first three symptom clusters reported the highest physical and psychological distress scores. Patient characteristics varied significantly across the five clusters by functional status (worst functional physical status in cluster one, p<0.001); being on ART (highest proportions for clusters two and three, p=0.012); global distress (F=26.8, p<0.001), physical distress (F=36.3, p<0.001) and psychological distress subscale (F=21.8, p<0.001) (all subscales worst for cluster one, best for cluster four).
The greatest burden is associated with cluster one, and should be prioritised in clinical management. Further symptom cluster research in people living with HIV with longitudinally collected symptom data to test cluster stability and identify common symptom trajectories is recommended.
以往针对各种病症的症状研究主要集中在单一症状上,多种症状及其相互作用所带来的负担相对被忽视,尤其是在艾滋病毒感染者中。需要进行症状群研究,以便在治疗规划中确定优先事项,并减轻总的症状负担。本研究旨在识别和比较撒哈拉以南非洲两个国家五家姑息治疗机构中艾滋病毒感染者的症状群。
使用来自32项纪念症状评估量表简表的七天症状患病率横断面自我报告数据。采用Ward法进行分层聚类分析,以平方欧氏距离作为相似性度量来确定聚类。使用列联表、卡方检验和方差分析,通过患者特定特征和痛苦评分来比较聚类。
在样本(N = 217)中,平均年龄为36.5岁(标准差9.0),73.2%为女性,49.1%正在接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)。聚类分析产生了五个症状群,分别为:1)皮肤病学相关;2)广泛性焦虑和排泄相关;3)社交和形象相关;4)持续存在的;5)胃肠道相关症状群。前三个症状群中的患者报告的生理和心理痛苦评分最高。五个聚类中的患者特征在功能状态方面差异显著(第一聚类中功能身体状态最差,p<0.001);接受ART治疗情况(第二和第三聚类中比例最高,p = 0.012);总体痛苦(F = 26.8,p<0.001)、生理痛苦(F = 36.3,p<0.001)和心理痛苦子量表(F = 21.8,p<0.001)(所有子量表在第一聚类中最差,在第四聚类中最好)。
最大的负担与第一聚类相关,在临床管理中应将其作为优先事项。建议对艾滋病毒感染者进行进一步的症状群研究,纵向收集症状数据以测试聚类稳定性并识别常见症状轨迹。