German Cancer Society, Berlin, Germany.
Oncol Res Treat. 2015;38(5):212-8. doi: 10.1159/000381739. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
The internet is an easy and always accessible source of information for cancer patients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the information provided on German websites.
We developed an instrument based on criteria for patient information from the German Network for Evidence-based Medicine, the Agency for Quality in Medicine, HONcode, DISCERN, and the afgis. We simulated a patient's search and derived the websites for evaluation. We analyzed the visibility of each website and evaluated the websites using the developed instrument.
We analyzed 77 websites. The highest visibility index was shown by 4 profit websites. Websites from professional societies and self-help groups have low rankings. Concerning quality, websites from non-profit providers and self-help groups are on top. Websites with a profit interest have the lowest average score.
A discrepancy exists between the visibility and the quality of the analyzed websites. With the internet becoming an important source of information on cancer treatments for patients, this may lead to false information and wrong decisions. We provide a list of suggestions as to how this risk may be reduced by complementary information from the physician and from trustworthy websites.
互联网是癌症患者获取信息的便捷且随时可得的资源。我们研究的目的是评估德国网站提供的信息。
我们基于德国循证医学网络、质量评估机构、HONcode、DISCERN 和 afgis 的患者信息标准制定了一个工具。我们模拟了患者的搜索,并得出了需要评估的网站。我们分析了每个网站的可见度,并使用制定的工具对网站进行了评估。
我们分析了 77 个网站。4 个盈利网站的可见度指数最高。来自专业协会和自助团体的网站排名较低。关于质量,非盈利机构和自助团体的网站名列前茅。有盈利意向的网站平均得分最低。
分析网站的可见度和质量之间存在差异。随着互联网成为癌症治疗信息的重要来源,这可能会导致错误的信息和错误的决策。我们提供了一份建议清单,说明如何通过医生和值得信赖的网站提供补充信息来降低这种风险。