Suppr超能文献

互联网上针对肿瘤患者的德语患者决策辅助工具的质量。

The quality of German - language patient decision aids for oncological patients on the internet.

机构信息

Klinik für Innere Medizin II Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07747, Jena, Germany.

Klinik für HNO-Erkrankungen Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie, Interdisziplinäre Palliativstation Südharz Klinikum Nordhausen, Dr.-Robert-Koch-Straße 39, 99734, Nordhausen, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02259-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have already shown that decision aids are a suitable tool for patient decision-making. The aim of this work is to conduct an online search for freely available, German-language patient decision aids (PDAs) for cancer patients, followed by an assessment of their quality. For this purpose, a rating tool that is as manageable as possible was developed on the basis of already existing quality criteria.

METHODS

A simulated patient online search was conducted via the four most frequently used search engines in Germany. A quality assessment tool was created utilizing international and national guidelines, with a focus on practicality and manageability. Subsequently, the identified PDAs were rated by 4 raters based on the rating tool.

RESULTS

The number of German-language oncology PDAs is low (n = 22 of 200 URLs) with limited variability regarding rare cancers. Most originate from non-profit organizations. The overall quality is low, as indicated by an average of 57.52% of the maximum evaluation points of the developed quality assessment tool. Reference values used to assess quality were related to e.g. support/effectiveness, adaptation, layout, etc. No qualitative differences were found regarding different publishers. Quality differed between PDAs of different length, with longer PDAs achieving better results.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the supply and quality of German-language PDAs is not satisfactory. The assessment tool created in this study provides a solid, but more manageable basis, for developing and identifying high-quality PDAs.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

PDAs should be increasingly used by physicians in practice. For this, a quick qualitative assessment of PDAs in everyday life must be possible. Future research has to investigate especially the aspect of the length of a PDA in more detail.

摘要

背景

之前的研究已经表明,决策辅助工具是患者决策的合适工具。本研究的目的是在线搜索免费的、德语的癌症患者决策辅助工具(PDAs),并对其质量进行评估。为此,在已有质量标准的基础上,开发了一种尽可能易于管理的评分工具。

方法

通过德国使用最频繁的四个搜索引擎进行模拟患者在线搜索。利用国际和国家指南创建了一个质量评估工具,重点是实用性和可管理性。随后,由 4 名评估者根据评分工具对确定的 PDAs 进行评分。

结果

德语肿瘤学 PDAs 的数量较少(200 个 URL 中有 22 个),罕见癌症的多样性有限。大多数来自非营利组织。总体质量较低,开发的质量评估工具的最高评估点平均为 57.52%。用于评估质量的参考值与支持/有效性、适应性、布局等有关。不同出版商之间没有发现定性差异。质量因 PDA 的长度不同而有所差异,较长的 PDA 效果更好。

结论

总体而言,德语 PDAs 的供应和质量不尽如人意。本研究创建的评估工具为开发和识别高质量 PDAs 提供了一个坚实但更易于管理的基础。

实践意义

医生应在实践中越来越多地使用 PDAs。为此,必须能够在日常生活中快速对 PDAs 进行定性评估。未来的研究必须更详细地研究 PDA 长度的方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验