Alrubaiy Laith, Rikaby Ibtihal, Sageer Mohamed, Hutchings Hayley Anne, Williams John Gordon
*Patient & Population Health and Informatics Research, College of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom; †Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Heath Park, Cardiff, United Kingdom; and ‡Lahey Hospital & Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015 Oct;21(10):2460-6. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000438.
Clinical disease severity indices are increasingly being used in choosing treatment and monitoring the response of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The aim of this study was to systematically review the clinical disease severity indices in IBD and to appraise their measurement properties and methodological quality.
We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO databases for original articles describing the development and/or evaluation of one or more of the measurement properties of clinical disease severity indices used in IBD. We assessed these properties (e.g., internal consistency, reliability, validity, responsiveness) using a standardized checklist.
We examined the full text of 142 articles that we deemed potentially eligible and identified 22 clinical disease severity indices in IBD. No clinical disease index has met all the required measurement properties. All of the validation studies were not descriptive enough to allow assessment of their methodology.
Although commonly used in multiple clinical trials, none of the clinical disease severity indices in IBD had all the required measurement properties. Further validation studies are required.
临床疾病严重程度指数越来越多地用于选择治疗方法和监测炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的反应。本研究的目的是系统评价IBD的临床疾病严重程度指数,并评估其测量特性和方法学质量。
我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO数据库,以查找描述IBD中使用的临床疾病严重程度指数的一种或多种测量特性的开发和/或评估的原始文章。我们使用标准化清单评估这些特性(例如,内部一致性、可靠性、有效性、反应性)。
我们检查了142篇我们认为可能符合条件的文章的全文,并确定了IBD中的22个临床疾病严重程度指数。没有一个临床疾病指数满足所有所需的测量特性。所有的验证研究都没有足够的描述性,无法评估其方法学。
尽管在多个临床试验中常用,但IBD的临床疾病严重程度指数均未具备所有所需的测量特性。需要进一步的验证研究。