Koloski N A, Jones M, Hammer J, von Wulffen M, Shah A, Hoelz H, Kutyla M, Burger D, Martin N, Gurusamy S R, Talley N J, Holtmann G
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Princess Alexandra Hospital and Translational Research Institute (TRI), Ipswich Rd, Woolloongabba, Brisbane, QLD, 4102, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Aug;62(8):1913-1922. doi: 10.1007/s10620-017-4599-6. Epub 2017 May 27.
The clinical assessments of patients with gastrointestinal symptoms can be time-consuming, and the symptoms captured during the consultation may be influenced by a variety of patient and non-patient factors. To facilitate standardized symptom assessment in the routine clinical setting, we developed the Structured Assessment of Gastrointestinal Symptom (SAGIS) instrument to precisely characterize symptoms in a routine clinical setting.
We aimed to validate SAGIS including its reliability, construct and discriminant validity, and utility in the clinical setting.
Development of the SAGIS consisted of initial interviews with patients referred for the diagnostic work-up of digestive symptoms and relevant complaints identified. The final instrument consisted of 22 items as well as questions on extra intestinal symptoms and was given to 1120 consecutive patients attending a gastroenterology clinic randomly split into derivation (n = 596) and validation datasets (n = 551). Discriminant validity along with test-retest reliability was assessed. The time taken to perform a clinical assessment with and without the SAGIS was recorded along with doctor satisfaction with this tool.
Exploratory factor analysis conducted on the derivation sample suggested five symptom constructs labeled as abdominal pain/discomfort (seven items), gastroesophageal reflux disease/regurgitation symptoms (four items), nausea/vomiting (three items), diarrhea/incontinence (five items), and difficult defecation and constipation (2 items). Confirmatory factor analysis conducted on the validation sample supported the initially developed five-factor measurement model ([Formula: see text], p < 0.0001, χ /df = 4.6, CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.88, RMSEA = 0.08). All symptom groups demonstrated differentiation between disease groups. The SAGIS was shown to be reliable over time and resulted in a 38% reduction of the time required for clinical assessment.
The SAGIS instrument has excellent psychometric properties and supports the clinical assessment of and symptom-based categorization of patients with a wide spectrum of gastrointestinal symptoms.
对有胃肠道症状患者的临床评估可能耗时,且会诊期间获取的症状可能受多种患者及非患者因素影响。为便于在常规临床环境中进行标准化症状评估,我们开发了胃肠道症状结构化评估(SAGIS)工具,以在常规临床环境中精确描述症状。
我们旨在验证SAGIS,包括其信度、结构效度、区分效度及在临床环境中的实用性。
SAGIS的开发包括对因消化症状转诊进行诊断检查的患者进行初步访谈,并确定相关主诉。最终工具包括22个项目以及关于肠外症状的问题,并将其给予连续就诊于胃肠病诊所的1120名患者,这些患者被随机分为推导数据集(n = 596)和验证数据集(n = 551)。评估区分效度以及重测信度。记录使用和不使用SAGIS进行临床评估所需的时间以及医生对该工具的满意度。
对推导样本进行的探索性因素分析表明有五个症状结构,分别标记为腹痛/不适(7项)、胃食管反流病/反流症状(4项)、恶心/呕吐(3项)、腹泻/失禁(5项)以及排便困难和便秘(2项)。对验证样本进行的验证性因素分析支持最初开发的五因素测量模型([公式:见正文],p < 0.0001,χ²/df = 4.6,CFI = 0.90,TLI = 0.88,RMSEA = 0.08)。所有症状组在疾病组之间均显示出差异。SAGIS随时间推移显示出可靠性,并使临床评估所需时间减少了38%。
SAGIS工具具有出色的心理测量特性,支持对有广泛胃肠道症状患者进行临床评估和基于症状的分类。