Simmons Catherine A, Howell Kathryn H, Duke Michael R, Beck J Gayle
University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016 Dec;17(5):532-541. doi: 10.1177/1524838015585312. Epub 2015 May 11.
The Family Justice Center (FJC) model is an approach to assisting survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV) that focuses on integration of services under one roof and co-location of staff members from a range of multidisciplinary agencies. Even though the FJC model is touted as a best practice strategy to help IPV survivors, empirical support for the effectiveness of this approach is scarce. The current article consolidates this small yet promising body of empirically based literature in a clinically focused review. Findings point to the importance of integrating additional resources into the FJC model to engage IPV survivors who have ambivalent feelings about whether to accept help, leave the abusive relationship, and/or participate in criminal justice processes to hold the offender accountable. One such resource, motivational interviewing (MI), holds promise in aiding IPV survivors with these decisions, but empirical investigation into how MI can be incorporated into the FJC model has yet to be published. This article, therefore, also integrates the body of literature supporting the FJC model with the body of literature supporting MI with IPV survivors. Implications for practice, policy, and research are incorporated throughout this review.
家庭司法中心(FJC)模式是一种协助亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)幸存者的方法,该模式侧重于将各种服务整合在同一屋檐下,并让来自一系列多学科机构的工作人员在同一地点办公。尽管FJC模式被誉为帮助IPV幸存者的最佳实践策略,但对该方法有效性的实证支持却很少。本文在以临床为重点的综述中整合了这一虽小但颇具前景的实证文献。研究结果表明,将额外资源整合到FJC模式中对于吸引那些对是否接受帮助、离开虐待关系和/或参与刑事司法程序以追究犯罪者责任存在矛盾心理的IPV幸存者非常重要。其中一种资源,即动机性访谈(MI),有望帮助IPV幸存者做出这些决定,但关于如何将MI纳入FJC模式的实证研究尚未发表。因此,本文还将支持FJC模式的文献与支持对IPV幸存者进行MI的文献进行了整合。在整个综述中都纳入了对实践、政策和研究的启示。