Gethin G, Killeen F, Devane D
School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland.
J Wound Care. 2015 May;24(5):211-2, 214, 216 passim. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.5.211.
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) affect up to 4% of the population aged over 65 years. Outcomes of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in VLUs are important to guide clinical and resource decision making. Our objective was to identify what endpoints and wound bed outcomes were assessed in RCTs in VLUs; how these were assessed and what reference was made to validity and reliability of methods used.
A systematic review of all full text RCTs, published in English, from 1998-2013.
Our criteria were met by 102 studies. There were 78 different endpoints recorded, the majority (n=34) related to healing and were evaluated at 12 different times points. Size was the most frequently reported outcome measure (n=99), with photographs, tissue type, exudate, odour and pain also recorded. There was poor reporting of methods used to assess outcomes. Visual analogue scales predominated as a method of assessment, but 95% of studies made no reference to the validity or reliability of assessment methods.
Future research in VLUs requires standards for measuring outcomes with acceptable inter-rater reliability and validated measures of patient-reported outcomes.
腿部静脉溃疡(VLU)影响着高达4%的65岁以上人群。VLU随机对照试验(RCT)的结果对于指导临床和资源决策很重要。我们的目的是确定在VLU的RCT中评估了哪些终点和伤口床结果;这些是如何评估的,以及对所使用方法的有效性和可靠性有哪些提及。
对1998年至2013年以英文发表的所有全文RCT进行系统评价。
102项研究符合我们的标准。记录了78种不同的终点,大多数(n = 34)与愈合相关,并在12个不同的时间点进行评估。面积是最常报告的结果指标(n = 99),还记录了照片、组织类型、渗出物、气味和疼痛情况。用于评估结果的方法报告不佳。视觉模拟量表是主要的评估方法,但95%的研究未提及评估方法的有效性或可靠性。
未来VLU的研究需要制定测量结果的标准,这些标准应具有可接受的评分者间信度,并采用经过验证的患者报告结果测量方法。