• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践中用于伤口面积测量的智能手机应用程序。

Smartphone application for wound area measurement in clinical practice.

作者信息

Biagioni Rodrigo Bruno, Carvalho Bruno Vinicius, Manzioni Renato, Matielo Marcelo Fernando, Brochado Neto Francisco Cardoso, Sacilotto Roberto

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2021 Feb 26;7(2):258-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.02.008. eCollection 2021 Jun.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.02.008
PMID:33997567
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8095078/
Abstract

A total of 85 consecutive patients had their wound area measured. The procedure was executed in two parts. The first was to take photographs of the wound using a smartphone and measure the area using the imitoMeasure application (imito; imito AG, Zurich, Switzerland) by two raters. The second was to take photographs of the same wound using a 10-megapixel digital camera and posterior measurement of the area using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md) by one operator. The mean area of the wounds was 12.20 ± 10.45 cm for imito and 12.67 ± 10.86 cm for ImageJ measurement. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between ImageJ and imito was 0.978 for a single measure and 0.989 for the average measure. Considering the two measurements, the ICC demonstrated excellent interobserver correlation using imito (0.987). Larger wounds had a greater difference between the methods (4.28% greater with the ImageJ measurement when considering areas >9 cm). No difference was found between iOS (ICC, 0.995) and android (ICC, 0.970) smartphone operating systems. The smartphone application is a useful method for area measurement with excellent accuracy compared with digital photography and the ImageJ processing tool.

摘要

共有85例连续患者的伤口面积被测量。该程序分两部分执行。第一部分是使用智能手机拍摄伤口照片,并由两名评估者使用imitoMeasure应用程序(imito;imito AG,瑞士苏黎世)测量面积。第二部分是使用1000万像素数码相机拍摄同一伤口照片,并由一名操作人员使用ImageJ软件(美国国立卫生研究院,马里兰州贝塞斯达)进行后期面积测量。imito测量的伤口平均面积为12.20±10.45平方厘米,ImageJ测量的为12.67±10.86平方厘米。ImageJ和imito之间的组内相关系数(ICC),单次测量为0.978,平均测量为0.989。综合两种测量方法,使用imito时ICC显示观察者间具有极好的相关性(0.987)。较大的伤口在两种方法之间的差异更大(当考虑面积>9平方厘米时,ImageJ测量的结果大4.28%)。在iOS(ICC,0.995)和安卓(ICC,0.970)智能手机操作系统之间未发现差异。与数码摄影和ImageJ处理工具相比,智能手机应用程序是一种具有极高准确性的面积测量有用方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78bc/8095078/d8f809e23124/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78bc/8095078/299629aaab85/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78bc/8095078/d8f809e23124/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78bc/8095078/299629aaab85/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78bc/8095078/d8f809e23124/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Smartphone application for wound area measurement in clinical practice.临床实践中用于伤口面积测量的智能手机应用程序。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2021 Feb 26;7(2):258-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2021.02.008. eCollection 2021 Jun.
2
Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.利用智能设备提高伤口面积测量精度和准确性的方法:高级应用程序 Planimator。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 5;13(3):e0192485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192485. eCollection 2018.
3
ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.ImageJ:一种使用数字图片测量腿部溃疡的免费、简便且可靠的方法。
Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2017 Dec;16(4):269-273. doi: 10.1177/1534734617744951.
4
Comparative Analysis of Mathematical Models and App-Based Measurement for Estimating the Cutaneous Wound Areas of Captive Asian Elephants.用于估算圈养亚洲象皮肤伤口面积的数学模型与基于应用程序测量的比较分析
Cureus. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):e65533. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65533. eCollection 2024 Jul.
5
Error rate of automated calculation for wound surface area using a digital photography.使用数码摄影自动计算伤口表面积的错误率。
Skin Res Technol. 2018 Feb;24(1):117-122. doi: 10.1111/srt.12398. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
6
A comparison of wound area measurement techniques: visitrak versus photography.伤口面积测量技术的比较:Visitrak与摄影法
Eplasty. 2011 Apr 18;11:e18.
7
A Comparison of Elbow Range of Motion Measurements: Smartphone-Based Digital Photography Versus Goniometric Measurements.肘关节活动范围测量的比较:基于智能手机的数码摄影与角度测量法
J Hand Surg Am. 2016 Apr;41(4):510-515.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.01.006. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
8
SfM-3DULC: Reliability of a new 3D wound measurement procedure and its accuracy in projected area.SfM-3DULC:一种新的 3D 伤口测量程序的可靠性及其在预测面积上的准确性。
Int Wound J. 2022 Jan;19(1):44-51. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13595. Epub 2021 May 18.
9
Wound Area Measurement with Digital Planimetry: Improved Accuracy and Precision with Calibration Based on 2 Rulers.采用数字平面测量法测量伤口面积:基于两把尺子进行校准可提高准确性和精密度。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):e0134622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134622. eCollection 2015.
10
Smartphone Photography as a Tool to Measure Knee Range of Motion.智能手机摄影作为测量膝关节活动范围的工具
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2018 Spring;27(1):52-57.

引用本文的文献

1
Honey as a Wound Care Modality in Treating Deep Neck Space Abscesses: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.蜂蜜作为治疗颈部深部间隙脓肿的伤口护理方式:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Aug 14;14:e75475. doi: 10.2196/75475.
2
Clinically validated classification of chronic wounds method with memristor-based cellular neural network.基于忆阻器的细胞神经网络的慢性伤口临床验证分类方法
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 28;14(1):30839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81521-9.
3
Application to Quantify Ulcer Areas and Track Their Progress.用于量化溃疡面积并跟踪其进展情况的应用程序。

本文引用的文献

1
Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.全球血管指南:慢性肢体威胁性缺血的管理。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S1-S109.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
2
Clinical Evaluation of Portable Wound Volumetric Measurement Devices.便携式伤口容积测量设备的临床评估。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2018 Aug;31(8):374-380. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000540072.52782.24.
3
Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Jun 19;12(6):e5922. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005922. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
GPs' attitudes towards and experiences of using the Dermabuddy health app for the management of patients with dermatological conditions: a descriptive cross-sectional study.全科医生对使用Dermabuddy健康应用程序管理皮肤病患者的态度和体验:一项描述性横断面研究。
BJGP Open. 2024 Oct 29;8(3). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0038. Print 2024 Oct.
5
Patient-Centered Chronic Wound Care Mobile Apps: Systematic Identification, Analysis, and Assessment.以患者为中心的慢性伤口护理移动应用程序:系统识别、分析和评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Mar 21;12:e51592. doi: 10.2196/51592.
6
Automated wound care by employing a reliable U-Net architecture combined with ResNet feature encoders for monitoring chronic wounds.通过采用可靠的U-Net架构并结合ResNet特征编码器来实现慢性伤口监测的自动化伤口护理。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 31;11:1310137. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1310137. eCollection 2024.
7
Implementation of a patient-centered remote wound monitoring system for management of diabetic foot ulcers.实施以患者为中心的远程伤口监测系统,以管理糖尿病足溃疡。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 May 24;14:1157518. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1157518. eCollection 2023.
8
AI-Assisted Assessment of Wound Tissue with Automatic Color and Measurement Calibration on Images Taken with a Smartphone.通过智能手机拍摄的图像进行自动颜色和测量校准的人工智能辅助伤口组织评估。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 16;11(2):273. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11020273.
9
Tigilanol Tiglate-Mediated Margins: A Comparison With Surgical Margins in Successful Treatment of Canine Mast Cell Tumours.替吉兰诺醇替格列酸盐介导的切缘:与手术切缘在犬肥大细胞瘤成功治疗中的比较
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Dec 15;8:764800. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.764800. eCollection 2021.
利用智能设备提高伤口面积测量精度和准确性的方法:高级应用程序 Planimator。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 5;13(3):e0192485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192485. eCollection 2018.
4
Point-of-care wound visioning technology: Reproducibility and accuracy of a wound measurement app.床旁伤口可视化技术:一款伤口测量应用程序的可重复性和准确性
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 17;12(8):e0183139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183139. eCollection 2017.
5
Reporting standards of the Society for Vascular Surgery for endovascular treatment of chronic lower extremity peripheral artery disease.血管外科学会关于慢性下肢外周动脉疾病血管内治疗的报告标准。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):e1-e21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.420.
6
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
7
Heterogeneity of wound outcome measures in RCTs of treatments for VLUs: a systematic review.静脉腿部溃疡治疗随机对照试验中伤口结局测量的异质性:一项系统评价。
J Wound Care. 2015 May;24(5):211-2, 214, 216 passim. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2015.24.5.211.
8
Comparison of standardized clinical evaluation of wounds using ruler length by width and Scout length by width measure and Scout perimeter trace.使用直尺测量伤口长乘宽、Scout测量长乘宽以及Scout周长追踪法进行伤口标准化临床评估的比较。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2015 Mar;28(3):116-21. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000461117.90346.0d.
9
Management of venous leg ulcers: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery ® and the American Venous Forum.下肢静脉性溃疡的管理:血管外科学会®和美国静脉论坛临床实践指南
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2 Suppl):3S-59S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.04.049. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
10
Reliability and validity of the revised photographic wound assessment tool on digital images taken of various types of chronic wounds.修订后的数码图像拍摄各种慢性伤口的摄影伤口评估工具的可靠性和有效性。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2013 Aug;26(8):360-73. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000431329.50869.6f.