Lampidis T J, Castello C, del Giglio A, Pressman B C, Viallet P, Trevorrow K W, Valet G K, Tapiero H, Savaraj N
Department of Oncology, Papanicolaou Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, FL.
Biochem Pharmacol. 1989 Dec 1;38(23):4267-71. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(89)90525-x.
Previously, we have shown that multiple drug resistant (MDR) Friend leukemia cells (FLC) are cross-resistant to the positively-charged dye, Rhodamine 123 (Rho 123), and that this resistance can be reversed by verapamil (VER). In the present study we used two zwitterionic rhodamine analogs, Rhodamine 116 and Rhodamine 110, and another positively-charged analog, Rhodamine 6G, to determine whether drug accumulation, resistance and modulation were affected by changes in the charge of these compounds. While there was no differential sensitivity between sensitive and resistant FLC to zwitterionic rhodamines, there was marked differential toxicity between these cell types for the positively-charged analogs. The IC50 values were 1000- and 100-fold greater in resistant than in sensitive cells for Rho 123 and Rho 6G respectively. Intracellular drug accumulation was significantly higher in sensitive as compared to resistant cells for both Rho 123 and Rho 6G, but little difference in drug uptake between these two cell types was observed for Rho 110 and Rho 116. It was also found that the intracellular to extracellular ratio of the positively-charged compounds was greater than unity in both sensitive and resistant cells whereas for the zwitterionic analogs this ratio was less than 1. Furthermore, this ratio of drug uptake was found to be significantly higher for Rho 6G than for Rho 123, which correlated with the high oil:water partition coefficient of Rho 6G (115.6). In MDR cells, verapamil increased Rho 123 and Rho 6G accumulation by 9.4- and 8.6-fold respectively. In addition, IC50 values in resistant cells were reduced greater than 100-fold for Rho 6G and greater than 1000-fold for Rho 123 in the presence of 10 micrograms/ml of verapamil. In contrast, less than 2-fold reduction of IC50 values for both of the zwitterionic analogs could be obtained under the same conditions. These results indicate that the chemical charge of rhodamines plays an important role in their differential accumulation, cytotoxicity and sensitivity to modulators such as verapamil, in sensitive and multi-drug resistant cells. The data also suggest that increased lipophilicity of the positively-charged rhodamines may increase their ability to accumulate in, and subsequently kill, MDR cells.
此前,我们已经表明,多重耐药(MDR)的弗氏白血病细胞(FLC)对带正电荷的染料罗丹明123(Rho 123)具有交叉耐药性,并且这种耐药性可被维拉帕米(VER)逆转。在本研究中,我们使用了两种两性离子罗丹明类似物罗丹明116和罗丹明110,以及另一种带正电荷的类似物罗丹明6G,以确定这些化合物电荷的变化是否会影响药物积累、耐药性及调节作用。虽然敏感和耐药的FLC对两性离子罗丹明没有差异敏感性,但对于带正电荷的类似物,这两种细胞类型之间存在明显的差异毒性。对于Rho 123和Rho 6G,耐药细胞中的半数抑制浓度(IC50)值分别比敏感细胞高1000倍和100倍。对于Rho 123和Rho 6G,敏感细胞中的细胞内药物积累显著高于耐药细胞,但对于Rho 110和Rho 116,这两种细胞类型之间的药物摄取差异不大。还发现,带正电荷化合物的细胞内与细胞外比率在敏感和耐药细胞中均大于1,而对于两性离子类似物,该比率小于1。此外,发现Rho 6G的药物摄取比率显著高于Rho 123,这与Rho 6G的高油:水分配系数(115.6)相关。在MDR细胞中,维拉帕米分别使Rho 123和Rho 6G的积累增加了9.4倍和8.6倍。此外,在存在10微克/毫升维拉帕米的情况下,耐药细胞中Rho 6G的IC50值降低了100倍以上,Rho 123的IC50值降低了1000倍以上。相比之下;在相同条件下,两种两性离子类似物的IC50值降低不到2倍。这些结果表明,罗丹明的化学电荷在其在敏感和多药耐药细胞中的差异积累、细胞毒性及对维拉帕米等调节剂的敏感性中起重要作用。数据还表明,带正电荷罗丹明亲脂性的增加可能会增强它们在MDR细胞中的积累能力,进而杀死这些细胞。