Griffith Christopher C, Pai Reetesh K, Schneider Frank, Duvvuri Umamaheswar, Ferris Robert L, Johnson Jonas T, Seethala Raja R
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Departments of Pathology and
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Departments of Pathology and.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Jun;143(6):839-53. doi: 10.1309/AJCPMII6OSD2HSJA.
Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is useful in the evaluation of salivary gland tumors, but currently no standard terminology or risk stratification model exists.
FNA smears were reviewed and categorized based on cytonuclear features, stromal characteristics, and background characteristics. Risk of malignancy was calculated for each category. Classifications as benign, neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (NUMP), suspicious for malignancy, and positive for malignancy were used to aggregate categories into similar risk groups.
Categorization of salivary gland aspirates into morphologic categories resulted in the expected risk stratification. Grouping of categories maintained risk stratification, providing classes with malignancy risk as follows: benign, 2%; NUMP, 18%; suspicious for malignancy, 76%; and positive for malignancy, 100%.
Salivary gland FNA categorization into commonly encountered morphologic categories provides risk stratification, which translates to a simplified classification scheme of benign, NUMP, suspicious, and positive for malignancy similar to the paradigm in other organ systems.
细针穿刺抽吸术(FNA)在唾液腺肿瘤评估中很有用,但目前尚无标准术语或风险分层模型。
根据细胞核特征、间质特征和背景特征对FNA涂片进行审查和分类。计算每个类别的恶性风险。使用良性、恶性潜能不确定的肿瘤(NUMP)、可疑恶性和恶性阳性的分类将类别汇总为相似的风险组。
将唾液腺抽吸物分类为形态学类别导致了预期的风险分层。类别分组维持了风险分层,为各类别提供的恶性风险如下:良性,2%;NUMP,18%;可疑恶性,76%;恶性阳性,100%。
将唾液腺FNA分类为常见的形态学类别可提供风险分层,这转化为一种类似于其他器官系统范例的良性、NUMP、可疑和恶性阳性的简化分类方案。