Matsubara Kosuke, Sakuda Keita, Nunome Haruka, Takata Tadanori, Koshida Kichiro, Gabata Toshifumi
Department of Quantum Medical Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Medical, Pharmaceutical and Health Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
Department of Radiological Technology, Kanazawa University Hospital, Kanazawa, Ishikawa Japan.
Acta Radiol. 2016 Jan;57(1):25-32. doi: 10.1177/0284185114562467. Epub 2015 May 12.
Dual-source computed tomography (CT) enables CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with a prospectively electrocardiography (ECG)-triggered high-pitch spiral (HPS) mode.
To evaluate the radiation dose, image quality, and diagnostic acceptability of the HPS mode in CTCA and to compare HPS with the step-and-shoot (SAS) and low-pitch spiral (LPS) modes.
One hundred and thirty-eight patients who underwent CTCA with a 128-slice dual-source CT scanner were retrospectively included in this study. Seventeen patients (average heart rate of ≤65 beats per minute [bpm] prior to acquisition) were evaluated in the HPS mode, 88 (average heart rate of >65 and ≤80 bpm prior to acquisition) in the SAS mode, and 33 (average heart rate of >80 bpm prior to acquisition or patients with an unstable heart rhythm) in the LPS mode. Radiation dose and image noise were recorded for each patient. Diagnostic acceptability was graded using a four-point scale (1, unacceptable; 2, suboptimal; 3, acceptable; 4, fully acceptable).
The effective dose in the HPS mode was 1.5 ± 0.2 mSv, which was lower than that in SAS (8.9 ± 2.7 mSv) and LPS (21.5 ± 4.3 mSv) modes. There were no significant differences in the image noise levels in the descending aorta and left atrium. The average per-patient diagnostic acceptability was 3.2, 3.6, and 3.7 in HPS, SAS, and LPS modes, respectively.
The radiation dose is lower with HPS than with other modes, and the HPS mode-acquired images of patients with heart rates of ≤65 bpm are nearly acceptable for diagnostic image interpretation.
双源计算机断层扫描(CT)可通过前瞻性心电图(ECG)触发的高螺距螺旋(HPS)模式进行CT冠状动脉造影(CTCA)。
评估HPS模式在CTCA中的辐射剂量、图像质量和诊断可接受性,并将HPS与步进式扫描(SAS)和低螺距螺旋(LPS)模式进行比较。
本研究回顾性纳入了138例接受128层双源CT扫描仪CTCA检查的患者。17例患者(采集前平均心率≤65次/分钟[bpm])采用HPS模式进行评估,88例(采集前平均心率>65且≤80 bpm)采用SAS模式,33例(采集前平均心率>80 bpm或心律不稳定的患者)采用LPS模式。记录每位患者的辐射剂量和图像噪声。使用四点量表(1,不可接受;2,次优;3,可接受;4,完全可接受)对诊断可接受性进行分级。
HPS模式下的有效剂量为1.5±0.2 mSv,低于SAS模式(8.9±2.7 mSv)和LPS模式(21.5±4.3 mSv)。降主动脉和左心房的图像噪声水平无显著差异。HPS、SAS和LPS模式下每位患者的平均诊断可接受性分别为3.2、3.6和3.7。
HPS模式的辐射剂量低于其他模式,对于心率≤65 bpm的患者,HPS模式采集的图像在诊断图像解读方面几乎可以接受。