Pathak Rahul, Patel Anish, Enuh Hilary, Adekunle Oluwaseyi, Shrisgantharajah Vasanthy, Diaz Keith
Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, NY.
Infect Dis Clin Pract (Baltim Md). 2015 May;23(3):131-134. doi: 10.1097/IPC.0000000000000237.
Our objective was to evaluate whether the use of midline venous catheters in place of central line venous catheters, when appropriate, decreased the overall incidence of central line-associated bacteremia in a ventilator unit.
The time interval between February 2012 and February 2013 was divided into 2 periods. Group A was the first half of the year, before the introduction of midline catheters, and group B was the second half of the year, 6 months after their introduction. Central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) was calculated using the equation: (total number of CLABSI/total number of catheter days) × 1000. The test was used for proportions between independent groups to compare the significance in the difference in CLABSI between groups A and B.
There was a significant decrease in the total number of catheter days on the ventilator unit in group A from 2408 catheter days in 1 year (August 1, 2011, to July 31, 2012) before the introduction of midline catheters to 1521 catheter days in group B in the following year (November 1, 2012, to October 31, 2013; < 0.05 for both groups).
Midline catheters in place of central lines decrease the rate of CLABSI in a ventilator unit. In addition, no bloodstream infections were associated with midline catheters.
我们的目标是评估在适当情况下使用中线静脉导管代替中心静脉导管是否能降低呼吸机病房中心静脉导管相关菌血症的总体发生率。
2012年2月至2013年2月的时间段分为两个时期。A组为引入中线导管前的上半年,B组为引入中线导管6个月后的下半年。中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)通过以下公式计算:(CLABSI总数/导管使用天数总数)×1000。采用独立组间比例检验来比较A组和B组CLABSI差异的显著性。
在引入中线导管前,A组呼吸机病房的导管使用天数总数在1年(2011年8月1日至2012年7月31日)内为2408天,次年(2012年11月1日至2013年10月31日)B组降至1521天,两组均有显著下降(P<0.05)。
使用中线导管代替中心静脉导管可降低呼吸机病房的CLABSI发生率。此外,中线导管未引发任何血流感染。