• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当纠正变为积极时:荷兰语中纠正性韵律的处理

When correction turns positive: processing corrective prosody in Dutch.

作者信息

Dimitrova Diana V, Stowe Laurie A, Hoeks John C J

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Centre for Language Studies, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Center for Language and Cognition Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; Neuroimaging Center, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 May 14;10(5):e0126299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126299. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0126299
PMID:25973607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4431819/
Abstract

Current research on spoken language does not provide a consistent picture as to whether prosody, the melody and rhythm of speech, conveys a specific meaning. Perception studies show that English listeners assign meaning to prosodic patterns, and, for instance, associate some accents with contrast, whereas Dutch listeners behave more controversially. In two ERP studies we tested how Dutch listeners process words carrying two types of accents, which either provided new information (new information accents) or corrected information (corrective accents), both in single sentences (experiment 1) and after corrective and new information questions (experiment 2). In both experiments corrective accents elicited a sustained positivity as compared to new information accents, which started earlier in context than in single sentences. The positivity was not modulated by the nature of the preceding question, suggesting that the underlying neural mechanism likely reflects the construction of an interpretation to the accented word, either by identifying an alternative in context or by inferring it when no context is present. Our experimental results provide strong evidence for inferential processes related to prosodic contours in Dutch.

摘要

当前关于口语的研究并未就韵律(言语的旋律和节奏)是否传达特定意义给出一致的描述。感知研究表明,以英语为母语的听众会赋予韵律模式意义,例如,将某些口音与对比联系起来,而以荷兰语为母语的听众的表现则更具争议性。在两项事件相关电位(ERP)研究中,我们测试了以荷兰语为母语的听众如何处理带有两种口音的单词,这两种口音要么提供新信息(新信息口音),要么纠正信息(纠正性口音),这两项测试分别在单个句子中进行(实验1),以及在纠正性和新信息问题之后进行(实验2)。在这两项实验中,与新信息口音相比,纠正性口音引发了持续的正电位,这种正电位在语境中比在单个句子中更早出现。这种正电位不受前一个问题性质的调节,这表明潜在的神经机制可能反映了对带口音单词的解释构建,要么是通过在语境中识别替代项,要么是在没有语境时进行推断。我们的实验结果为荷兰语中与韵律轮廓相关的推理过程提供了有力证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/fabd0fb4b76d/pone.0126299.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/1ccd96ca15d6/pone.0126299.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/793b60cb57e0/pone.0126299.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/9e64561cf9a5/pone.0126299.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/ae6fd4dc2f2d/pone.0126299.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/fabd0fb4b76d/pone.0126299.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/1ccd96ca15d6/pone.0126299.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/793b60cb57e0/pone.0126299.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/9e64561cf9a5/pone.0126299.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/ae6fd4dc2f2d/pone.0126299.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62af/4431819/fabd0fb4b76d/pone.0126299.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
When correction turns positive: processing corrective prosody in Dutch.当纠正变为积极时:荷兰语中纠正性韵律的处理
PLoS One. 2015 May 14;10(5):e0126299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126299. eCollection 2015.
2
Sentence context influences the subjective perception of foreign accents.句子语境会影响对外语口音的主观感知。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jan;172:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
3
Less is not more: neural responses to missing and superfluous accents in context.少即是多:语境中缺失和多余重音的神经反应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Dec;24(12):2400-18. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00302. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
4
The neural processing of pitch accents in continuous speech.连续语音中重音音高的神经处理。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Jul 30;158:107883. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.107883. Epub 2021 May 11.
5
Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.语言结构和意义将神经振荡组织成内容特定的层级。
J Neurosci. 2020 Dec 2;40(49):9467-9475. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0302-20.2020. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
6
Where does a 'foreign' accent matter? German, Spanish and Singaporean listeners' reactions to Dutch-accented English, and standard British and American English accents.“外国”口音重要吗?德国、西班牙和新加坡听众对荷兰口音英语以及标准的英国和美国英语口音的反应。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0231089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231089. eCollection 2020.
7
Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.言语噪声识别中的说话者-听话者口音交互作用:韵律操控的影响与语言经验有关。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2010 Sep;128(3):1357-65. doi: 10.1121/1.3466857.
8
Nonnative Accent Discrimination with Words and Sentences.对带有非母语口音的单词和句子的歧视。
Phonetica. 2017;74(3):173-191. doi: 10.1159/000452956. Epub 2017 Mar 7.
9
Are Serbian and English listeners insensitive to lexical pitch accents in Serbian?塞尔维亚语和英语听众对塞尔维亚语词汇重音不敏感吗?
Phonetica. 2022 Sep 8;79(4):397-423. doi: 10.1515/phon-2022-2023. Print 2022 Aug 26.
10
Listening effort during speech perception enhances auditory and lexical processing for non-native listeners and accents.在言语感知过程中集中注意力可以增强非母语者和非本地口音者的听觉和词汇处理能力。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Phonological markers of information structure: an fMRI study.音系标记信息结构:一项 fMRI 研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 May;58:64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Apr 12.
2
Questions left unanswered: how the brain responds to missing information.未解答的问题:大脑如何对缺失的信息做出反应。
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 2;8(10):e73594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073594. eCollection 2013.
3
(De-)accentuation and the process of information status: evidence from event-related brain potentials.(去)重音与信息状态过程:来自事件相关脑电位的证据
Lang Speech. 2012 Sep;55(Pt 3):361-81. doi: 10.1177/0023830911422184.
4
Less is not more: neural responses to missing and superfluous accents in context.少即是多:语境中缺失和多余重音的神经反应。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Dec;24(12):2400-18. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00302. Epub 2012 Sep 27.
5
Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension.正视语义错觉:重新思考 P600 在语言理解中的功能作用。
Brain Res. 2012 Mar 29;1446:127-43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.01.055. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
6
Intraoperative tumor localization with surgeon-performed ultrasound-guided needle dye injection.术中超声引导下染料注射进行肿瘤定位。
Laryngoscope. 2011 Aug;121(8):1651-5. doi: 10.1002/lary.21774. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
7
Interpreting Pitch Accents in Online Comprehension: H* vs. L+H*.在线理解中重音的解释:H* 与 L+H*。
Cogn Sci. 2008 Oct;32(7):1232-44. doi: 10.1080/03640210802138755.
8
FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data.FieldTrip:用于 MEG、EEG 和有创电生理数据的高级分析的开源软件。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869. doi: 10.1155/2011/156869. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
9
The influence of information structure on the depth of semantic processing: how focus and pitch accent determine the size of the N400 effect.信息结构对语义加工深度的影响:焦点和重音如何决定 N400 效应的大小。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Apr;49(5):813-820. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.035. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
10
Recognition memory reveals just how CONTRASTIVE contrastive accenting really is.识别记忆揭示了对比重音实际上是多么具有对比性。
J Mem Lang. 2010 Oct 1;63(3):367-386. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.004.