Kim Richard, Schell Michael J, Teer Jamie K, Greenawalt Danielle M, Yang Mingli, Yeatman Timothy J
Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States of America.
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2015 May 14;10(5):e0126670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126670. eCollection 2015.
Metastasis is thought to be a clonal event whereby a single cell initiates the development of a new tumor at a distant site. However the degree to which primary and metastatic tumors differ on a molecular level remains unclear. To further evaluate these concepts, we used next generation sequencing (NGS) to assess the molecular composition of paired primary and metastatic colorectal cancer tissue specimens.
468 colorectal tumor samples from a large personalized medicine initiative were assessed by targeted gene sequencing of 1,321 individual genes. Eighteen patients produced genomic profiles for 17 paired primary:metastatic (and 2 metastatic:metastatic) specimens.
An average of 33.3 mutations/tumor were concordant (shared) between matched samples, including common well-known genes (APC, KRAS, TP53). An average of 2.3 mutations/tumor were discordant (unshared) among paired sites. KRAS mutational status was always concordant. The overall concordance rate for mutations was 93.5%; however, nearly all (18/19 (94.7%)) paired tumors showed at least one mutational discordance. Mutations were seen in: TTN, the largest gene (5 discordant pairs), ADAMTS20, APC, MACF1, RASA1, TP53, and WNT2 (2 discordant pairs), SMAD2, SMAD3, SMAD4, FBXW7, and 66 others (1 discordant pair).
Whereas primary and metastatic tumors displayed little variance overall, co-evolution produced incremental mutations in both. These results suggest that while biopsy of the primary tumor alone is likely sufficient in the chemotherapy-naïve patient, additional biopsies of primary or metastatic disease may be necessary to precisely tailor therapy following chemotherapy resistance or insensitivity in order to adequately account for tumor evolution.
转移被认为是一种克隆性事件,即单个细胞在远处部位引发新肿瘤的形成。然而,原发性肿瘤和转移性肿瘤在分子水平上的差异程度仍不清楚。为了进一步评估这些概念,我们使用下一代测序(NGS)来评估配对的原发性和转移性结直肠癌组织标本的分子组成。
通过对1321个个体基因进行靶向基因测序,评估了来自一项大型个性化医疗计划的468个结直肠肿瘤样本。18名患者提供了17对原发性:转移性(以及2对转移性:转移性)标本的基因组图谱。
匹配样本之间平均每个肿瘤有33.3个突变是一致的(共享的),包括常见的知名基因(APC、KRAS、TP53)。配对部位之间平均每个肿瘤有2.3个突变是不一致的(非共享的)。KRAS突变状态始终一致。突变的总体一致率为93.5%;然而,几乎所有(18/19(94.7%))配对肿瘤都显示出至少一个突变不一致。在以下基因中发现了突变:TTN,最大的基因(5对不一致)、ADAMTS20、APC、MACF1、RASA1、TP53和WNT2(2对不一致)、SMAD2、SMAD3、SMAD4、FBXW7以及其他66个基因(1对不一致)。
虽然原发性肿瘤和转移性肿瘤总体上差异不大,但共同进化在两者中都产生了渐进性突变。这些结果表明,对于未接受过化疗的患者,单独对原发性肿瘤进行活检可能就足够了,但在化疗耐药或不敏感后,可能需要对原发性或转移性疾病进行额外活检,以便精确调整治疗方案,从而充分考虑肿瘤的进化。