Suppr超能文献

用于计算Kt/V的床边公式。一种更温和的尿素动力学建模方法。

Bedside formulas for K.t/V. A kinder, gentler approach to urea kinetic modeling.

作者信息

Daugirdas J T

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Veterans Administration Hospital, Hines, Illinois.

出版信息

ASAIO Trans. 1989 Jul-Sep;35(3):336-8. doi: 10.1097/00002480-198907000-00052.

Abstract

Based on an empiric analysis of urea kinetic modeling equations, three formulas were derived for use at the bedside: (F1) Ob.t = 14.W.(K.t/V); (F2) target R = e-K.t/V + 0.03 + UF/W; (F3) K.t/V = -In (R - 0.03 - UF/W); where Qb = blood flow (ml/min); t = session length (h); R = post/pre BUN; UF = ultrafiltrate volume (L/session); and W = postdialysis weight (kg). When a particular K.t/V is desired, F1 is used to estimate Qb for a given W and t. Qb, t, and/or dialyzer type are then adjusted until R = target R calculated by F2 (based on target K.t/V, UF, and W). F3 estimates delivered K.t/V from R, UF, and W. These formulas were validated against 336 conventional 3-point modeling sessions in 256 patients. The multiplier "14" in F1 actually averaged 12.5 +/- 2.8, the large standard deviation suggesting that use of F1 would often result in K.t/V values substantially above or below the target K.t/V. The main causes of error were unusual V/W or K/Qb. On the other hand, F2 and F3 were highly accurate: target R estimated by F2 predicted actual R (at a given K.t/V, UF, and W) very well (% error = 0.65 +/- 2.3); K.t/V estimated by F3 predicted actual K.t/V (% error = 0.74 +/- 2.7). The results suggest that attainment of a target R (F2) will ensure that the target K.t/V is being delivered; F3 is useful to estimate K.t/V.F1 is an initial estimate only of the dialysis Rx; it must be followed by adjustment of t, Qb, or dialyzer until target R (from F2) is attained.

摘要

基于对尿素动力学建模方程的实证分析,推导了三个用于床边的公式:(F1) Ob.t = 14.W.(K.t/V);(F2) 目标R = e-K.t/V + 0.03 + UF/W;(F3) K.t/V = -In (R - 0.03 - UF/W);其中Qb = 血流量(ml/分钟);t = 治疗时长(h);R = 透析后/透析前血尿素氮;UF = 超滤量(L/次治疗);W = 透析后体重(kg)。当需要特定的K.t/V时,使用F1根据给定的W和t估算Qb。然后调整Qb、t和/或透析器类型,直到R = F2计算出的目标R(基于目标K.t/V、UF和W)。F3根据R、UF和W估算实际的K.t/V。这些公式在256例患者的336次传统三点建模治疗中得到验证。F1中的乘数“14”实际平均为12.5±2.8,较大的标准差表明使用F1常常会导致K.t/V值大幅高于或低于目标K.t/V。误差的主要原因是V/W或K/Qb异常。另一方面,F2和F3非常准确:F2估算的目标R能很好地预测实际R(在给定的K.t/V、UF和W时)(误差百分比 = 0.65±2.3);F3估算的K.t/V能很好地预测实际K.t/V(误差百分比 = 0.74±2.7)。结果表明,达到目标R(F2)将确保实现目标K.t/V;F3有助于估算K.t/V。F1仅是透析处方的初步估算值;必须随后调整t、Qb或透析器,直到达到目标R(来自F2)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验