• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者与医疗服务提供者对哮喘及哮喘护理的认知:一项定性研究

Patients' and providers' perceptions of asthma and asthma care: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Mowrer J Lauren, Tapp Hazel, Ludden Thomas, Kuhn Lindsay, Taylor Yhenneko, Courtlandt Cheryl, Alkhazraji Tami, Reeves Kelly, Steuerwald Mark, Andrew McWilliams, Dulin Michael

机构信息

a Dickson Advanced Analytics, Carolinas HealthCare System , Charlotte , NC , USA .

b Family Medicine Research, Carolinas HealthCare System , Charlotte , NC , USA .

出版信息

J Asthma. 2015;52(9):949-56. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1010731. Epub 2015 Sep 12.

DOI:10.3109/02770903.2015.1010731
PMID:25975701
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differences in patients' and providers' perceptions of asthma and asthma care can create barriers to successful treatment. The primary goal of this qualitative study was to further explore patient and provider perceptions of asthma and asthma care as part of a larger Asthma Comparative Effectiveness Study.

METHODS

Focus groups held every 6 months for 3 years were designed to have a mix of both patients and providers allowing for unique understanding around asthma care.

RESULTS

The discussion centered on goal setting, asthma action plans and prevention strategies for asthma exacerbations. Three overarching themes, with a variety of subthemes, emerged as the main findings of this study. The three main themes were Cost/Economic Barriers/Process, Self-Governance/Adherence and Education.

CONCLUSIONS

These themes indicated a strong need for patient educational interventions around asthma as well as education for providers around cost, insurance coverage and patient-centered communication. Specifically, education on learning to use inhalers properly, avoiding triggers and understanding the importance of a controller medication will benefit patients in the long-term management of asthma.

摘要

背景

患者与医疗服务提供者对哮喘及哮喘护理的认知差异可能会给成功治疗带来障碍。作为一项规模更大的哮喘比较疗效研究的一部分,这项定性研究的主要目的是进一步探究患者与医疗服务提供者对哮喘及哮喘护理的认知。

方法

在3年时间里,每6个月举行一次焦点小组讨论,参与者包括患者和医疗服务提供者,以便对哮喘护理形成独特的理解。

结果

讨论集中在哮喘发作的目标设定、哮喘行动计划和预防策略上。本研究的主要发现呈现出三个总体主题以及多个子主题。这三个主要主题分别是成本/经济障碍/流程、自我管理/依从性和教育。

结论

这些主题表明,迫切需要围绕哮喘对患者进行教育干预,同时也需要对医疗服务提供者进行有关成本、保险覆盖范围和以患者为中心的沟通方面的教育。具体而言,关于正确使用吸入器、避免触发因素以及理解控制药物重要性的教育,将有助于患者进行哮喘的长期管理。

相似文献

1
Patients' and providers' perceptions of asthma and asthma care: a qualitative study.患者与医疗服务提供者对哮喘及哮喘护理的认知:一项定性研究
J Asthma. 2015;52(9):949-56. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2015.1010731. Epub 2015 Sep 12.
2
Assessing Patient and Provider Perceptions of Factors Associated with Patient Engagement in Asthma Care.评估患者和提供者对与哮喘护理中患者参与相关的因素的看法。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 May;14(5):659-666. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-602OC.
3
Filling the patient-provider knowledge gap: a patient advocate to address asthma care and self-management barriers.填补患者与医疗服务提供者之间的知识差距:一位患者倡导者应对哮喘护理和自我管理障碍。
J Asthma. 2019 Oct;56(10):1027-1036. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1520864. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Patients' perspective of barriers and facilitators to taking long-term controller medication for asthma: a novel taxonomy.患者对哮喘长期控制药物治疗障碍与促进因素的看法:一种新的分类法。
BMC Pulm Med. 2015 Apr 25;15:42. doi: 10.1186/s12890-015-0044-9.
5
Patient and provider perspectives on uptake of a shared decision making intervention for asthma in primary care practices.患者与医疗服务提供者对基层医疗实践中哮喘共同决策干预措施接受情况的看法。
J Asthma. 2019 May;56(5):562-572. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1471703. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
6
Are patients discharged with care? A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of patients, family members and care providers.患者出院时得到妥善照料了吗?一项关于患者、家属及护理人员认知与体验的定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2012 Dec;21 Suppl 1:i39-49. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001165. Epub 2012 Nov 1.
7
Non-adherence in children with asthma reviewed: The need for improvement of asthma care and medical education.儿童哮喘治疗依从性综述:改善哮喘护理与医学教育的必要性
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2015 May;26(3):197-205. doi: 10.1111/pai.12362.
8
Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study.沟通不畅可能会损害哮喘的最佳治疗效果:一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2007 Feb;24(1):65-70. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml062. Epub 2006 Dec 7.
9
Mapping the Asthma Care Process: Implications for Research and Practice.绘制哮喘护理流程图谱:对研究和实践的启示。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2016 Sep-Oct;4(5):868-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.04.020. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
10
What does it take to set goals for self-management in primary care? A qualitative study.在初级保健中为自我管理设定目标需要什么?一项定性研究。
Fam Pract. 2016 Dec;33(6):698-703. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw054. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an asthma health-care burden score as a measure of severity and predictor of remission in SARP III and U-BIOPRED: results from two major longitudinal asthma cohorts.开发哮喘医疗负担评分作为SARP III和U-BIOPRED中严重程度的衡量指标及缓解的预测指标:来自两个主要哮喘纵向队列的结果
Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Jan;13(1):35-46. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00250-9. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
2
The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies.哮喘患者共享决策的体验:系统评价和定性研究的荟萃分析。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14039. doi: 10.1111/hex.14039.
3
The Design of a Persuasive Game to Motivate People with Asthma in Adherence to Their Maintenance Medication.
一款用于激励哮喘患者坚持使用维持药物的劝导性游戏的设计
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2023 Nov 1;17:2719-2736. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S423161. eCollection 2023.
4
Epidemiology of Asthma: Prevalence and Burden of Disease.哮喘流行病学:患病率和疾病负担。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2023;1426:3-23. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-32259-4_1.
5
Setting Goals to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: A Retrospective Chart Review of a Pharmacist-Led Initiative in the Workplace.设定降低心血管风险的目标:一项药师主导的工作场所干预的回顾性图表研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 2;20(1):846. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010846.
6
Implementation of Coach McLungs into primary care using a cluster randomized stepped wedge trial design.采用整群随机化阶梯式楔形试验设计将麦克伦教练引入初级保健。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Nov 4;22(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02030-1.
7
Understanding the journeys of patients with an asthma exacerbation requiring urgent therapy at a primary care clinic.了解在初级保健诊所接受紧急治疗的哮喘加重患者的就诊经历。
BMC Pulm Med. 2022 Jun 16;22(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02024-9.
8
Parent/Guardian Experiences With the Healthcare System and Community Supports for Pediatric Asthma Management.家长/监护人在医疗保健系统中的经历以及社区对儿童哮喘管理的支持。
J Patient Exp. 2022 Apr 18;9:23743735221089458. doi: 10.1177/23743735221089458. eCollection 2022.
9
Barriers to implementing asthma self-management in Malaysian primary care: qualitative study exploring the perspectives of healthcare professionals.在马来西亚初级保健中实施哮喘自我管理的障碍:探索医疗保健专业人员观点的定性研究。
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2021 Jul 7;31(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41533-021-00250-y.
10
Factors affecting healthcare pathways for chronic lung disease management in Vietnam: a qualitative study on patients' perspectives.影响越南慢性肺病管理医疗路径的因素:一项关于患者观点的定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 15;21(1):1145. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11219-4.