• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[第六版与第七版TNM pT分类对胃癌预后预测价值的比较]

[Comparison of the predictive value of the sixth and seventh edition TNM pT classifications in prognosis for gastric cancer].

作者信息

Zhang Peng, Xu Yan, Guo Jiangning, Xu Humian

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, the 201st Hospital of PLA, Liaoyang 111000, China.

Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015 Mar;37(3):190-4.

PMID:25975787
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical application value of the 7th edition UICC-AJCC TNM pT classification of gastric cancer.

METHODS

The classification of tumor invasion depth of 874 cases of gastric cancer was determined using the 7th edition UICC-AJCC TNM classification and the relationships of prognosis with clinicopathological factors was compared with that obtained using the 6th edition TNM classification.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rates according to the 6th edition pT1, pT2, pT3, pT4 were 98.4%, 55.8%, 26.0% and 24.5%, respectively, showing a significant difference among the four substages (P<0.001). The 5-year survival rates according to the 7th edition pT1a, pT1b, pT2, pT3, pT4a, and pT4b were 98.6%, 98.2%, 75.8%, 48.9%, 26.0% and 24.5%, respectively, and there were significant differences in survival time among the six substages (P<0.001). According to the 7th edition TNM classification, for the pT2 and pT3 patients groups, the 5-year survival rates of the 7th edition pN0 (without lymphatic metastasis) were 84.8% and 77.9%, respectively, showing no significant difference between the two survival rates (P=0.204). The 5-year survival rates according to the 7th edition pNx (with lymphatic metastasis) were 66.9% and 37.5%, respectively, and there was a significant difference between the two survival times (P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, the 7th edition pT stage, vascular or lymphatic invasion, the 6th edition pT staging and primary tumor site were independent prognostic factors in patients with gastric cancer (P<0.05), and the relationship of the staging of the 7th version of pT was more close with the prognosis of patients with gastric carcinoma than that of the 6th edition of pT staging system.

CONCLUSION

The 7th edition UICC-AJCC classification of pT staging of gastric cancer patients has a better prognostic predictive value than the 6th edition.

摘要

目的

分析第7版UICC-AJCC TNM pT分类在胃癌中的临床应用价值。

方法

采用第7版UICC-AJCC TNM分类法确定874例胃癌患者的肿瘤浸润深度,并将其预后与临床病理因素的关系与第6版TNM分类法所得结果进行比较。

结果

第6版pT1、pT2、pT3、pT4患者的5年生存率分别为98.4%、55.8%、26.0%和24.5%,四个亚阶段之间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。第7版pT1a、pT1b、pT2、pT3、pT4a和pT4b患者的5年生存率分别为98.6%、98.2%、75.8%、48.9%、26.0%和24.5%,六个亚阶段之间的生存时间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。根据第7版TNM分类,对于pT2和pT3患者组,第7版pN0(无淋巴结转移)的5年生存率分别为84.8%和77.9%,两者生存率无显著差异(P=0.204)。第7版pNx(有淋巴结转移)的5年生存率分别为66.9%和37.5%,两者生存时间存在显著差异(P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,第7版pT分期、血管或淋巴管侵犯、第6版pT分期和原发肿瘤部位是胃癌患者的独立预后因素(P<0.05),且第7版pT分期与胃癌患者预后的关系比第6版pT分期系统更密切。

结论

第7版UICC-AJCC胃癌患者pT分期分类法比第6版具有更好的预后预测价值。

相似文献

1
[Comparison of the predictive value of the sixth and seventh edition TNM pT classifications in prognosis for gastric cancer].[第六版与第七版TNM pT分类对胃癌预后预测价值的比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2015 Mar;37(3):190-4.
2
[The Comparison between 6th and 7th International Union Against Cancer/American Joint Committee on Cancer Classification for Survival Prognosis of Gastric Cancer].[国际抗癌联盟/美国癌症联合委员会第6版与第7版胃癌生存预后分类的比较]
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2011 Nov 25;58(5):258-63. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2011.58.5.258.
3
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.聚焦于“N”参数相关生存率的AJCC/UICC胃癌TNM分期系统第6版与第7版比较:意大利单中心NodUs研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul 16;13:215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0633-3.
4
[Evaluation of the value of 7th editions of UICC-AJCC esophageal and gastric cancer TNM staging systems for prognostic prediction of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (Siewert type II)].[UICC-AJCC第7版食管癌和胃癌TNM分期系统对食管胃交界腺癌(SiewertⅡ型)预后预测价值的评估]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 Dec 23;36(12):916-21. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3766.2014.12.008.
5
Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.评估第七版美国癌症联合委员会胃癌 TNM 分期系统:来自中国单机构研究的结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jun;19(6):1918-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2206-1. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
6
A comparison between the sixth and seventh editions of the UICC/AJCC staging system for nasopharyngeal carcinoma in a Chinese cohort.中国队列中 UICC/AJCC 鼻咽癌分期系统第六版与第七版的比较。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 23;9(12):e116261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116261. eCollection 2014.
7
Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy.考虑肿瘤大小可提高根治性胃切除术后胃癌患者 TNM 预测的准确性。
Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;22(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 18.
8
Comparison of 6th and 7th AJCC TNM staging classification for carcinoma of the stomach in China.中国胃癌第 6 版与第 7 版 AJCC TNM 分期比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Jul;18(7):1869-76. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1542-x. Epub 2011 Jan 19.
9
The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.新(7 版)UICC N 分期系统在胃癌患者预后评估中的有效性:第 5/6 版与第 7 版 UICC N 分期的比较研究。
Gastric Cancer. 2011 Jun;14(2):166-71. doi: 10.1007/s10120-011-0024-6. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
10
Comparison of staging between the old (6th edition) and new (7th edition) TNM classifications in advanced gastric cancer.比较新旧(第 6 版和第 7 版)TNM 分类在晚期胃癌中的分期。
Anticancer Res. 2011 Jun;31(6):2361-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC/UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer focusing on the "N" parameter-related survival: the monoinstitutional NodUs Italian study.聚焦于“N”参数相关生存率的AJCC/UICC胃癌TNM分期系统第6版与第7版比较:意大利单中心NodUs研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul 16;13:215. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0633-3.