Bece Andrej, Patanjali Nitya, Jackson Michael, Whitaker May, Hruby George
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Brachytherapy. 2015 Sep-Oct;14(5):670-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 May 11.
To report disease outcomes and late urinary toxicity profile. To assess the impact of changing technique and evolving quality assurance on genitourinary toxicity rates.
One hundred eighty patients were treated with external beam radiation therapy and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) for localized intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer, between December 2002 and February 2012. The HDRB technique evolved over the period of this study, from 19.5 Gy/3 (n = 68), to 17 Gy/2 (n = 40), 18 Gy/2 (n = 39), and most recently 19 Gy/2 (n = 33). In the two fraction cohort, 68 patients underwent additional correction for catheter displacement before each fraction.
With a median followup of 5.2 years, 5-year freedom from failure was 93.7% for intermediate, and 76.0% for high risk patients. The 3- and 6-year cumulative stricture incidence for all patients was 7.8% and 15.3%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in stricture rate for the four dose levels used nor between the three fractions and the two fraction technique overall. The 19 Gy/2 fractionation group had the lowest 3-year stricture rate (3.0%). The addition of correction for intrafraction catheter displacement did not result in a statistically significant difference in stricture rates, although the severity of strictures has been reduced.
Our biochemical control is consistent with other similar series. We found no increase in late urinary toxicity with a two fraction, two implant HDRB technique compared with three fractions. The HDRB dose did not correlate with stricture rates in our series. Correction of intra-fraction catheter displacement did not lead to a statistically significant reduction in stricture rates, although may have mitigated the effects of dose escalation.
报告疾病转归及晚期泌尿毒性情况。评估技术改变和质量保证发展对泌尿生殖系统毒性发生率的影响。
2002年12月至2012年2月期间,180例局限性中高危前列腺癌患者接受了外照射放疗和高剂量率近距离放疗(HDRB)。在本研究期间,HDRB技术不断发展,从19.5 Gy/3(n = 68),发展到17 Gy/2(n = 40)、18 Gy/2(n = 39),最近是19 Gy/2(n = 33)。在两分割组中,68例患者在每次分割前对导管移位进行了额外校正。
中位随访5.2年,中危患者5年无失败生存率为93.7%,高危患者为76.0%。所有患者3年和6年累积狭窄发生率分别为7.8%和15.3%。所使用的四个剂量水平之间以及三分割和两分割技术总体之间的狭窄率无统计学显著差异。19 Gy/2分割组3年狭窄率最低(3.0%)。尽管狭窄严重程度有所降低,但分割内导管移位校正并未导致狭窄率有统计学显著差异。
我们的生化控制情况与其他类似系列一致。我们发现,与三分割相比,两分割、两次植入的HDRB技术并未增加晚期泌尿毒性。在我们的系列中,HDRB剂量与狭窄率无关。分割内导管移位校正虽可能减轻了剂量增加的影响,但并未导致狭窄率有统计学显著降低。