Suppr超能文献

聚乙烯回收:欧盟 27 国的废物政策情景分析。

Polyethylene recycling: Waste policy scenario analysis for the EU-27.

机构信息

Liverpool Hope University - Business School, Hope Park L16 9JD Liverpool, UK.

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (JRC-IPTS), Edificio Expo, C/Inca Garcilaso 3, E-41092 Seville, Spain.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2015 Aug 1;158:103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.036. Epub 2015 May 12.

Abstract

This paper quantifies the main impacts that the adoption of the best recycling practices together with a reduction in the consumption of single-use plastic bags and the adoption of a kerbside collection system could have on the 27 Member States of the EU. The main consequences in terms of employment, waste management costs, emissions and energy use have been quantified for two scenarios of polyethylene (PE) waste production and recycling. That is to say, a "business as usual scenario", where the 2012 performances of PE waste production and recycling are extrapolated to 2020, is compared to a "best practice scenario", where the best available recycling practices are modelled together with the possible adoption of the amended Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive related to the consumption of single-use plastic bags and the implementation of a kerbside collection system. The main results show that socio-economic and environmental benefits can be generated across the EU by the implementation of the best practice scenario. In particular, estimations show a possible reduction of 4.4 million tonnes of non-recycled PE waste, together with a reduction of around €90 million in waste management costs in 2020 for the best practice scenario versus the business as usual scenario. An additional 35,622 jobs are also expected to be created. In environmental terms, the quantity of CO2 equivalent emissions could be reduced by around 1.46 million tonnes and the net energy requirements are expected to increase by 16.5 million GJ as a consequence of the reduction in the energy produced from waste. The main analysis provided in this paper, together with the data and the model presented, can be useful to identify the possible costs and benefits that the implementation of PE waste policies and Directives could generate for the EU.

摘要

本文量化了采用最佳回收实践、减少一次性塑料袋的使用以及采用路边收集系统可能对欧盟 27 个成员国产生的主要影响。针对两种聚乙烯(PE)废物产生和回收情况,本文量化了在就业、废物管理成本、排放和能源使用方面的主要后果。也就是说,将 2012 年的 PE 废物产生和回收表现外推到 2020 年的“按部就班情景”,与采用最佳可用回收实践并可能采用与一次性塑料袋使用相关的修订后的《包装和包装废物指令》以及实施路边收集系统的“最佳实践情景”进行了比较。主要结果表明,通过实施最佳实践情景,欧盟可以在社会经济和环境方面产生效益。特别是,估计表明,在最佳实践情景下,到 2020 年,可能会减少 440 万吨无法回收的 PE 废物,并减少约 9000 万欧元的废物管理成本,而在按部就班情景下则不会。预计还将创造 35622 个额外工作岗位。在环境方面,由于废物产生的能源减少,CO2 当量排放量可能减少约 146 万吨,净能源需求预计将增加 1650 万吉焦。本文提供的主要分析,以及提出的数据和模型,可用于确定实施 PE 废物政策和指令可能为欧盟带来的潜在成本和效益。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验